Localization
Providers using this tag (49)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 6 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 16 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 12 Limited public surface area
Emerging 6 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 7 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (16)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 4 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 7 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 2 Limited public surface area
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (11)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Localization” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
49 providers carry this tag directly, and 51 counting the 1 narrower tag below — 2 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 47 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Localization, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 39.7 | 17.6 | +22.1 | 47 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 40.5 | 23.2 | +17.3 | 47 |
| Access Clarity | 40.4 | 26.5 | +13.9 | 47 |
| Operational Transparency | 24.7 | 13.7 | +11 | 47 |
| Discoverability | 65.7 | 58.1 | +7.6 | 47 |
| Contract Governance | 8 | 6.3 | +1.7 | 47 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 21% | 14% | +7 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 21% | 12% | +9 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 6% | 11% | -5 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 26% | 14% | +12 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Prismic 71.1
- 2 Wistia 69.3
- 3 General Translation 63.9
- 4 Lilt 60.8
- 5 Smartcat 59.7
- 6 Dyspatch 58.3
- 7 Amazon Translate 57.8
- 8 Calendarific 54.3
- 9 DeepL 50
- 10 TextMaster 49.8
- 1 Smartling 57.1
- 2 Prismic 53.6
- 3 Lilt 53
- 4 Weglot 50.4
- 5 Lokalise 44.6
- 6 TextMaster 40
- 7 Weblate 37.4
- 8 Wistia 35.9
- 9 Smartcat 35.7
- 10 Algebras AI 35.3
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.