emerging · 0.4 capabilitymarket actiondomain

Knowledge Graph

Score 21.6 / 100 50 providers +9 via APIs 22 APIs Search apis.io →
Variants seen in the corpus: Knowledge GraphsKnowledge Graph

Providers using this tag (50)

Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.

Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 14 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 11 Limited public surface area
Emerging 17 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 3 Almost no public developer surface

APIs with this tag (20)

Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →

Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 3 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 3 Limited public surface area
Emerging 8 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface

Companies reaching this through an API (9)

These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Knowledge Graph” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.

Bem Collibra EPFL Events.com Google Microsoft Bing SAP HANA Trisotech UniProt

Score breakdown

Frequency
51.1
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
1.3
spread across providers
Quality lift
40.0
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
3.6
strength of nearest seed neighbor

Related tags

Semantic Web 7 co-occurrences SPARQL 7 co-occurrences Memory 7 co-occurrences Linked Data 6 co-occurrences Entities 5 co-occurrences RAG 5 co-occurrences Connectors 5 co-occurrences Query 7 co-occurrences

Where this tag comes from

Provider tag50
Api tag22
Openapi tag3
Openapi op tag6

Cohort brief

Auto-generated

The 50 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Knowledge Graph, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.

Providers
50
all scored
Mean Kin Score
32.6
+9.7 vs catalog 22.9
Mean Agent Readiness
20.7
+8.8 vs catalog 11.9
Spread
3.7–75.4
median 32.7 · σ 17.4
How the 50 split by band
Exemplar 2Strong 2Developing 15Thin 11Emerging 15Minimal 5
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
FacetThis cohortCatalogDifferenceScored
Developer Ergonomics 36.3 23.2 +13.1 50
Contract Quality 28.1 17.6 +10.5 50
Operational Transparency 22.3 13.7 +8.6 50
Discoverability 65.8 58.1 +7.7 50
Access Clarity 32.2 26.5 +5.7 50
Contract Governance 9 6.3 +2.7 50

A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.

What this cohort publishes
ArtifactThis cohortCatalogDifference
MCP server (any) 32% 14% +18
MCP server (first-party) 34% 12% +22
Agent Skills 0% 0% 0
OAuth scopes 20% 11% +9
Security 96% 98% -2
Arazzo workflows 6% 2% +4
Governance rules 18% 14% +4

mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.

Top by Kin Score
  1. 1 Diffbot 75.4
  2. 2 Fodda (PSFK) 67.6
  3. 3 Structify 64.5
  4. 4 Endgame 57.5
  5. 5 Wikidata 53.6
  6. 6 Indykite 52.6
  7. 7 Cognee 49.5
  8. 8 Tako 49.5
  9. 9 Stack Exchange 48
  10. 10 Nex 47.6
Top by Agent Readiness
  1. 1 Fodda (PSFK) 57
  2. 2 Yext 54.3
  3. 3 Flume Health 51.2
  4. 4 Signal AI 49.1
  5. 5 Endgame 48.9
  6. 6 Diffbot 44.8
  7. 7 Tako 43.2
  8. 8 Golden Recursion 36.5
  9. 9 Golden 36.5
  10. 10 Structify 34.5
All 50 members of this roster resolve to a scored provider in the catalog.
Coverage caveat. 39 of 50 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.

Work with this as data

Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.

MCP server

One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.

https://apis.io/mcp

Tools for tags

7 MCP tools reach this
  • find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.
  • get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.
  • cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.
  • cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.
  • apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.
  • resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.
  • find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
All 92 tools →

Call it yourself

curl for this page
This tag
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/knowledge-graph"
All tags
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
As a scored cohort
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/knowledge-graph"
The distribution (Pro)
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/knowledge-graph/stats" \
  -H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"

Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.

Get an API key

Free tier, no form to fill in. Signing in shares your email address with us — we store it to create your key and to recognise you if you sign in with another provider. See our Privacy Policy and Terms.

A second provider on the same verified email joins the account you already have.