Event Management
Providers using this tag (43)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 11 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 11 Limited public surface area
Emerging 10 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 5 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (12)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 6 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 1 Limited public surface area
Companies reaching this through an API (6)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Event Management” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
43 providers carry this tag directly, and 54 counting the 3 narrower tags below — 11 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 42 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Event Management, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 46.2 | 26.5 | +19.7 | 42 |
| Contract Quality | 31.1 | 17.6 | +13.5 | 42 |
| Operational Transparency | 25 | 13.7 | +11.3 | 42 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 33.8 | 23.2 | +10.6 | 42 |
| Discoverability | 66 | 58.1 | +7.9 | 42 |
| Contract Governance | 7.6 | 6.3 | +1.3 | 42 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 17% | 14% | +3 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 17% | 12% | +5 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 26% | 11% | +15 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 2% | 2% | 0 |
| Governance rules | 12% | 14% | -2 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Cvent 78
- 2 Cvent Registration 76.9
- 3 Cvent Event Cloud 71.9
- 4 Cvent Social Tables 63.5
- 5 Moogsoft 62.4
- 6 EventX 56
- 7 Zenoss 51.6
- 8 Airmeet 50.3
- 9 Demio 48.4
- 10 Splash 48.3
- 1 Cvent Event Cloud 46.1
- 2 Moogsoft 45.8
- 3 Accelevents 44.6
- 4 Luma 44.5
- 5 Cvent 42.6
- 6 Cvent Registration 42.6
- 7 31huiyi 36.3
- 8 Demio 35.8
- 9 Pavoot 34.6
- 10 EventX 34.2
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.