Webinars
Providers using this tag (29)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 5 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 11 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 3 Limited public surface area
Emerging 4 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 3 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (22)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 4 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 7 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 5 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 2 Limited public surface area
Emerging 3 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 29 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Webinars, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 51.3 | 22.3 | +29 | 29 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 40.2 | 17.9 | +22.3 | 29 |
| Contract Quality | 39.4 | 17.5 | +21.9 | 29 |
| Operational Transparency | 28.9 | 11.3 | +17.6 | 29 |
| Contract Governance | 21.7 | 6.4 | +15.3 | 29 |
| Discoverability | 73.6 | 60.4 | +13.2 | 29 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 45% | 16% | +29 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 14% | 7% | +7 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 38% | 9% | +29 |
| Security | 93% | 88% | +5 |
| Arazzo workflows | 10% | 2% | +8 |
| Governance rules | 31% | 13% | +18 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 HubSpot 82.4
- 2 GetResponse 74.1
- 3 GoTo Webinar 67.8
- 4 Wistia 65.1
- 5 Sequel 60.4
- 6 Reliance Jio 58.4
- 7 RingCentral 58.2
- 8 WebinarJam 54.9
- 9 Airmeet 52.6
- 10 GoToWebinar 51.3
- 1 HubSpot 54.4
- 2 Sequel 52
- 3 GetResponse 50.4
- 4 RingCentral 41.4
- 5 GoTo Webinar 36.2
- 6 Demio 35.8
- 7 Wistia 35.6
- 8 Zoom 34.1
- 9 Banzai 34
- 10 EasyWebinar 33.5
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/webinars"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/webinars"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/webinars/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.