niche · -1.6 marketcapability domainschemaresource

Embedded

Score 18.8 / 100 41 providers +24 via APIs 35 APIs Search apis.io →

Providers using this tag (41)

Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.

Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 5 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 11 Limited public surface area
Emerging 14 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 8 Almost no public developer surface

APIs with this tag (35)

Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →

Strong 4 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 12 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 11 Limited public surface area
Emerging 6 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface

Companies reaching this through an API (24)

These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Embedded” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.

ADP AstroPay Blues Census Corti Dropbox Dropbox Sign (HelloSign) Gladly Gusto Hopper Layla AI MindCloud OptinMonster Playroll Power BI Quickwork Ramp Network Signeasy Sony Tailor Brands TensorFlow Truework TuneIn VNC

Score breakdown

Frequency
50.8
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
0.9
spread across providers
Quality lift
26.3
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
3.9
strength of nearest seed neighbor

Related tags

Firmware 9 co-occurrences Microcontrollers 7 co-occurrences Edge AI 7 co-occurrences Device Management 7 co-occurrences IoT 21 co-occurrences Devices 7 co-occurrences Semiconductors 10 co-occurrences Fleet Management 7 co-occurrences

Where this tag comes from

Provider tag42
Api tag35
Openapi tag4
Openapi op tag9

Cohort brief

Auto-generated

The 38 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Embedded, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.

Providers
38
of 41 in the catalog
Mean Kin Score
26.9
+4.7 vs catalog 22.2
Mean Agent Readiness
10.8
-1.2 vs catalog 12
Spread
4.4–70
median 26.2 · σ 15.6
How the 38 split by band
Exemplar 1Strong 2Developing 5Thin 11Emerging 14Minimal 5
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
FacetThis cohortCatalogDifferenceScored
Developer Ergonomics 37.4 23.2 +14.2 38
Access Clarity 30.6 23.9 +6.7 38
Operational Transparency 17.1 13 +4.1 38
Discoverability 58.7 57.9 +0.8 38
Contract Governance 6.3 6.5 -0.2 38
Contract Quality 14.9 17.2 -2.3 38

A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.

What this cohort publishes
ArtifactThis cohortCatalogDifference
MCP server (any) 11% 13% -2
MCP server (first-party) 13% 12% +1
Agent Skills 0% 0% 0
OAuth scopes 5% 11% -6
Security 100% 98% +2
Arazzo workflows 3% 2% +1
Governance rules 16% 16% 0

mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.

Top by Kin Score
  1. 1 Losant 70
  2. 2 Viam 59.2
  3. 3 Particle 55.3
  4. 4 1NCE 46.1
  5. 5 Golioth 45.5
  6. 6 Whereby 45.4
  7. 7 Renesas 43.5
  8. 8 Cesanta 40.1
  9. 9 ELISA 36.3
  10. 10 Zephyr Project 35.7
Top by Agent Readiness
  1. 1 Losant 62.7
  2. 2 Renesas 42
  3. 3 Memfault 31.6
  4. 4 Particle 23.9
  5. 5 Viam 22.6
  6. 6 1NCE 22.6
  7. 7 Golioth 21.9
  8. 8 SiFive 21.4
  9. 9 Whereby 20.7
  10. 10 Cesanta 19.9
All 41 members of this roster resolve to a provider in the catalog; 38 carry a score (93%). The figures above describe the scored members only.
Coverage caveat. 32 of 38 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 24 October 2026, across 31984 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.

Work with this as data

Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.

MCP server

One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.

https://apis.io/mcp

Tools for tags

7 MCP tools reach this
  • find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.
  • get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.
  • cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.
  • cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.
  • apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.
  • resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.
  • find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
All 92 tools →

Call it yourself

curl for this page
This tag
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/embedded"
All tags
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
As a scored cohort
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/embedded"
The distribution (Pro)
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/embedded/stats" \
  -H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"

Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.

Get an API key

Free tier, no form to fill in. Signing in shares your email address with us — we store it to create your key and to recognise you if you sign in with another provider. See our Privacy Policy and Terms.

A second provider on the same verified email joins the account you already have.