established · 0.9 market domain

Digital Asset Management

Score 24.3 / 100 34 providers +4 via APIs 11 APIs Search apis.io →
Variants seen in the corpus: DAMDigital Asset Management

Providers using this tag (34)

Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.

Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 9 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 11 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 6 Limited public surface area
Emerging 3 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface

APIs with this tag (11)

Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →

Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 4 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 1 Limited public surface area
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface

Companies reaching this through an API (4)

These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Digital Asset Management” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.

Adobe Creative Suite Adobe Suite Perforce Sitecore

Score breakdown

Frequency
45.1
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
0.9
spread across providers
Quality lift
57.3
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
9.1
strength of nearest seed neighbor

Related tags

Brand Management 5 co-occurrences Content Management 13 co-occurrences Creative 5 co-occurrences Assets 14 co-occurrences Image 8 co-occurrences Marketing 15 co-occurrences Media 13 co-occurrences Video 9 co-occurrences

Where this tag comes from

Provider tag34
Api tag11

Cohort brief

Auto-generated

The 33 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Digital Asset Management, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.

Providers
33
all scored
Mean Kin Score
47.8
+24.9 vs catalog 22.9
Mean Agent Readiness
31.7
+19.8 vs catalog 11.9
Spread
9.5–80.4
median 48.2 · σ 16.2
How the 33 split by band
Exemplar 3Strong 9Developing 11Thin 6Emerging 3Minimal 1
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
FacetThis cohortCatalogDifferenceScored
Access Clarity 57.2 26.5 +30.7 33
Contract Quality 44.2 17.6 +26.6 33
Developer Ergonomics 49.7 23.2 +26.5 33
Operational Transparency 40.1 13.7 +26.4 33
Discoverability 69 58.1 +10.9 33
Contract Governance 11.4 6.3 +5.1 33

A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.

What this cohort publishes
ArtifactThis cohortCatalogDifference
MCP server (any) 33% 14% +19
MCP server (first-party) 33% 12% +21
Agent Skills 0% 0% 0
OAuth scopes 45% 11% +34
Security 100% 98% +2
Arazzo workflows 3% 2% +1
Governance rules 21% 14% +7

mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.

Top by Kin Score
  1. 1 Adobe 80.4
  2. 2 Acquia 76.8
  3. 3 Prismic 71.1
  4. 4 Acoustic 64.7
  5. 5 Newscred 64.7
  6. 6 MediaValet 61.7
  7. 7 CI HUB 61.4
  8. 8 Bynder 60.5
  9. 9 Salsify 59
  10. 10 Frontify 58
Top by Agent Readiness
  1. 1 Adobe 65
  2. 2 Acquia 60.6
  3. 3 Prismic 53.6
  4. 4 Acoustic 53
  5. 5 CI HUB 52
  6. 6 Salsify 51.3
  7. 7 Cloudinary 45.7
  8. 8 Frontify 41.7
  9. 9 Newscred 39
  10. 10 Bynder 37.9
All 34 members of this roster resolve to a scored provider in the catalog.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.

Work with this as data

Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.

MCP server

One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.

https://apis.io/mcp

Tools for tags

7 MCP tools reach this
  • find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.
  • get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.
  • cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.
  • cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.
  • apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.
  • resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.
  • find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
All 92 tools →

Call it yourself

curl for this page
This tag
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/digital-asset-management"
All tags
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
As a scored cohort
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/digital-asset-management"
The distribution (Pro)
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/digital-asset-management/stats" \
  -H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"

Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.

Get an API key

Free tier, no form to fill in. Signing in shares your email address with us — we store it to create your key and to recognise you if you sign in with another provider. See our Privacy Policy and Terms.

A second provider on the same verified email joins the account you already have.