established · 0.5

Destinations

Score 25.4 / 100 39 providers 42 APIs Search apis.io →
Workflows using this tag
Hookdeck Upsert a Connection by Name · Hookdeck Hookdeck Test Then Update a Transformation · Hookdeck Hookdeck Retry a Failed Event · Hookdeck Hookdeck Replay an Inbound Request · Hookdeck Hookdeck Provision a Connection · Hookdeck Hookdeck Create an Inline Connection · Hookdeck Hookdeck Attach an Integration to a New Source · Hookdeck Hookdeck Bulk Retry Failed Events · Hookdeck
Business capabilities this tag reaches
Cybersecurity Management 1 Developer Platform & API Ecosystem Management 1
Variants seen in the corpus: Destinationsdestinations

Providers using this tag (39)

Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.

Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 9 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 15 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 9 Limited public surface area
Emerging 3 Early or largely undocumented

APIs with this tag (37)

Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →

Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 7 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 13 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 11 Limited public surface area
Emerging 3 Early or largely undocumented

Score breakdown

Frequency
54.7
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
1.1
spread across providers
Quality lift
57.1
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
0.0
strength of nearest seed neighbor

Related tags

Sources 16 co-occurrences Principals 5 co-occurrences Reverse ETL 5 co-occurrences Transformation 5 co-occurrences Dimensions 5 co-occurrences Streams 6 co-occurrences Data Pipeline 7 co-occurrences Connections 9 co-occurrences

Where this tag comes from

Api tag41
Provider tag2
Openapi tag30
Openapi op tag138

Cohort brief

Auto-generated

The 39 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Destinations, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.

Providers
39
all scored
Mean Kin Score
46.5
+25.8 vs catalog 20.7
Mean Agent Readiness
29.7
+20.0 vs catalog 9.7
Spread
10.5–80.2
median 48.2 · σ 14.7
How the 39 split by band
Exemplar 3Strong 10Developing 13Thin 10Emerging 2Minimal 1
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
FacetThis cohortCatalogDifferenceScored
Contract Quality 56.4 17.5 +38.9 39
Developer Ergonomics 44.9 17.9 +27 39
Access Clarity 47 22.3 +24.7 39
Operational Transparency 33.4 11.3 +22.1 39
Contract Governance 21.3 6.4 +14.9 39
Discoverability 69.9 60.4 +9.5 39

A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.

What this cohort publishes
ArtifactThis cohortCatalogDifference
MCP server (any) 36% 16% +20
MCP server (first-party) 13% 7% +6
Agent Skills 0% 0% 0
OAuth scopes 28% 9% +19
Security 97% 88% +9
Arazzo workflows 23% 2% +21
Governance rules 62% 13% +49

mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.

Top by Kin Score
  1. 1 RudderStack 80.2
  2. 2 Hightouch 70.6
  3. 3 Airbyte 66.6
  4. 4 Palo Alto Networks 63.7
  5. 5 Onfleet 62.3
  6. 6 Cisco Umbrella 61.1
  7. 7 Covalent 60.4
  8. 8 Amplitude 57.1
  9. 9 Datadog 57.1
  10. 10 Loop Returns 57.1
Top by Agent Readiness
  1. 1 Hightouch 61.2
  2. 2 RudderStack 52
  3. 3 Precog 50
  4. 4 Bombora 46.4
  5. 5 Viator 45.9
  6. 6 Airbyte 43.9
  7. 7 Palo Alto Networks 39.4
  8. 8 Datadog 38.3
  9. 9 Komerce 35
  10. 10 Amadeus 33.5
All 39 members of this roster resolve to a scored provider in the catalog.Generated from the catalog build of 25 August 2026, across 26891 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.

Work with this as data

Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.

MCP server

One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.

https://apis.io/mcp

Tools for tags

7 MCP tools reach this
  • find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.
  • get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.
  • cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.
  • cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.
  • apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.
  • resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.
  • find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
All 92 tools →

Call it yourself

curl for this page
This tag
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/destinations"
All tags
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
As a scored cohort
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/destinations"
The distribution (Pro)
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/destinations/stats" \
  -H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"

Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.

Get an API key

Free tier, no email required.

A second provider on the same verified email joins the account you already have.