Access Management
Access Managementaccess-management
Providers using this tag (56)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Developing 26 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 14 Limited public surface area
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (27)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 5 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 13 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 7 Limited public surface area
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 56 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Access Management, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 43.7 | 17.9 | +25.8 | 56 |
| Contract Quality | 39.8 | 17.5 | +22.3 | 56 |
| Access Clarity | 37.2 | 22.3 | +14.9 | 56 |
| Operational Transparency | 25.1 | 11.3 | +13.8 | 56 |
| Discoverability | 70.2 | 60.4 | +9.8 | 56 |
| Contract Governance | 15.3 | 6.4 | +8.9 | 56 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 38% | 16% | +22 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 20% | 7% | +13 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 23% | 9% | +14 |
| Security | 98% | 88% | +10 |
| Arazzo workflows | 11% | 2% | +9 |
| Governance rules | 36% | 13% | +23 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Dynatrace 71.8
- 2 GitLab 65.3
- 3 KPN 61.9
- 4 Upwind 57
- 5 Soracom 55.8
- 6 C1 55.4
- 7 Oracle 53
- 8 TagoIO 52.3
- 9 Amazon IAM 51
- 10 Microsoft Entra 50.7
- 1 Upwind Security 52.9
- 2 GitLab 47.8
- 3 Upwind 43.7
- 4 Oracle 41.9
- 5 Serval 41
- 6 KPN 40.8
- 7 Opal Security 37.1
- 8 Door 36.5
- 9 Cakewalk 34.7
- 10 Dynatrace 32.4
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.