Quantum Computing
Quantum Computingquantum-computing
Providers using this tag (47)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 7 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 5 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 6 Limited public surface area
Emerging 14 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (53)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 14 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 1 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 2 Limited public surface area
Emerging 36 Early or largely undocumented
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 47 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Quantum Computing, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 29.7 | 17.9 | +11.8 | 47 |
| Operational Transparency | 14.6 | 11.3 | +3.3 | 47 |
| Access Clarity | 25.3 | 22.3 | +3 | 47 |
| Contract Quality | 18.7 | 17.5 | +1.2 | 47 |
| Discoverability | 61 | 60.4 | +0.6 | 47 |
| Contract Governance | 6 | 6.4 | -0.4 | 47 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 13% | 16% | -3 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 0% | 7% | -7 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 9% | 9% | 0 |
| Security | 94% | 88% | +6 |
| Arazzo workflows | 9% | 2% | +7 |
| Governance rules | 19% | 13% | +6 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 ibm-quantum 65.8
- 2 D-Wave 63.3
- 3 Microsoft Azure Quantum 62.6
- 4 AWS Braket 61.8
- 5 IonQ 59.4
- 6 Google Quantum AI 59.3
- 7 Rigetti Computing 57.2
- 8 Alice Bob 51
- 9 Quandela 49.8
- 10 Amazon Braket 49.4
- 1 ibm-quantum 29.8
- 2 Rigetti Computing 29.3
- 3 Rigetti & Co 29
- 4 Rigetti Computing 29
- 5 Quandela 28.2
- 6 Google Quantum AI 27.8
- 7 IonQ 26.9
- 8 Microsoft Azure Quantum 25.3
- 9 Quantum Art 23.9
- 10 AWS Braket 22.8
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.