Findings
Findingsfindings
Providers using this tag (28)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 5 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 10 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 9 Limited public surface area
Emerging 3 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (29)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 5 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 10 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 10 Limited public surface area
Emerging 3 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 28 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Findings, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 50.3 | 17.5 | +32.8 | 28 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 42.6 | 17.9 | +24.7 | 28 |
| Access Clarity | 38.8 | 22.3 | +16.5 | 28 |
| Discoverability | 74.6 | 60.4 | +14.2 | 28 |
| Operational Transparency | 25 | 11.3 | +13.7 | 28 |
| Contract Governance | 15.9 | 6.4 | +9.5 | 28 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 46% | 16% | +30 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 18% | 7% | +11 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 18% | 9% | +9 |
| Security | 96% | 88% | +8 |
| Arazzo workflows | 14% | 2% | +12 |
| Governance rules | 43% | 13% | +30 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 anecdotes 65.4
- 2 OutSystems 61.2
- 3 Datadog 57.1
- 4 Xbow 56.1
- 5 Amazon Security Hub 55
- 6 Qwiet Ai 53.8
- 7 Amazon Inspector 51.7
- 8 Amazon Macie 51.4
- 9 Pixee 49.7
- 10 Plerion 49.1
- 1 watchTowr 38.7
- 2 Datadog 38.3
- 3 anecdotes 36.7
- 4 Amazon CodeGuru Security 34.5
- 5 Amazon Macie 34.5
- 6 Splunk 34
- 7 SAP Ariba 33.9
- 8 Amazon Inspector 33.7
- 9 Qwiet Ai 33.7
- 10 Xbow 32.1
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/findings"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/findings"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/findings/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.