established · -1.5 market domain

CPaaS

Score 25.1 / 100 57 providers +4 via APIs 25 APIs Search apis.io →
Variants seen in the corpus: Communications Platform as a ServiceCPaaS

Providers using this tag (57)

Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.

Exemplar 7 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 9 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 11 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 15 Limited public surface area
Emerging 11 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 4 Almost no public developer surface

APIs with this tag (25)

Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →

Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 7 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 8 Limited public surface area
Emerging 6 Early or largely undocumented

Companies reaching this through an API (4)

These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “CPaaS” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.

Swisscom Telia Company Totogi TPG Telecom

Score breakdown

Frequency
51.1
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
1.3
spread across providers
Quality lift
42.7
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
23.1
strength of nearest seed neighbor

Where this tag sits

Communications broader

Related tags

SMS 45 co-occurrences RCS 11 co-occurrences WhatsApp 17 co-occurrences MMS 9 co-occurrences OTP 10 co-occurrences Voice 35 co-occurrences Phone Numbers 12 co-occurrences Mobile Network Operator 8 co-occurrences

Where this tag comes from

Provider tag57
Api tag25

Markets provisional

Kin Score markets whose measured providers carry this tag. Share is the fraction of the market's measured providers that carry it — it describes the market, not this tag.

MarketShare of the market's providers
Telecom Network APIs (CAMARA)40%
Communications (CPaaS)28%

Cohort brief

Auto-generated

The 57 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged CPaaS, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.

Providers
57
all scored
Mean Kin Score
40.7
+18.5 vs catalog 22.2
Mean Agent Readiness
29.8
+17.8 vs catalog 12
Spread
2.2–86.1
median 38.4 · σ 20.4
How the 57 split by band
Exemplar 7Strong 9Developing 11Thin 15Emerging 11Minimal 4
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
FacetThis cohortCatalogDifferenceScored
Contract Quality 46 17.2 +28.8 57
Developer Ergonomics 42.8 23.2 +19.6 57
Operational Transparency 29.5 13 +16.5 57
Access Clarity 36 23.9 +12.1 57
Discoverability 69.6 57.9 +11.7 57
Contract Governance 12.5 6.5 +6 57

A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.

What this cohort publishes
ArtifactThis cohortCatalogDifference
MCP server (any) 30% 13% +17
MCP server (first-party) 25% 12% +13
Agent Skills 0% 0% 0
OAuth scopes 25% 11% +14
Security 98% 98% 0
Arazzo workflows 0% 2% -2
Governance rules 30% 16% +14

mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.

Top by Kin Score
  1. 1 Telnyx 86.1
  2. 2 Infobip 84.9
  3. 3 Leadping 75.4
  4. 4 Sinch 71.7
  5. 5 8x8 71.3
  6. 6 Regal 70
  7. 7 SignalWire 66.9
  8. 8 CM.com 64.1
  9. 9 Genesys 62.4
  10. 10 Bandwidth 61
Top by Agent Readiness
  1. 1 Telnyx 78.1
  2. 2 Leadping 71.7
  3. 3 Bird 61.5
  4. 4 Infobip 61.3
  5. 5 Teliax 59.1
  6. 6 Regal 54.9
  7. 7 Genesys 54.3
  8. 8 Sinch 53.6
  9. 9 FreJun Teler 49.8
  10. 10 CM.com 49.5
All 57 members of this roster resolve to a scored provider in the catalog.
Coverage caveat. 42 of 57 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 24 October 2026, across 31984 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.

Work with this as data

Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.

MCP server

One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.

https://apis.io/mcp

Tools for tags

7 MCP tools reach this
  • find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.
  • get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.
  • cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.
  • cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.
  • apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.
  • resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.
  • find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
All 92 tools →

Call it yourself

curl for this page
This tag
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/cpaas"
All tags
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
As a scored cohort
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/cpaas"
The distribution (Pro)
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/cpaas/stats" \
  -H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"

Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.

Get an API key

Free tier, no form to fill in. Signing in shares your email address with us — we store it to create your key and to recognise you if you sign in with another provider. See our Privacy Policy and Terms.

A second provider on the same verified email joins the account you already have.