Cloud Infrastructure
Providers using this tag (45)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 4 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 13 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 13 Limited public surface area
Emerging 7 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 3 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (5)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 2 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 2 Limited public surface area
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (1)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Cloud Infrastructure” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 42 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Cloud Infrastructure, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 49.7 | 23.4 | +26.3 | 42 |
| Contract Quality | 38.7 | 20.1 | +18.6 | 42 |
| Operational Transparency | 31.3 | 14 | +17.3 | 42 |
| Access Clarity | 38.1 | 26.5 | +11.6 | 42 |
| Discoverability | 67.5 | 61 | +6.5 | 42 |
| Contract Governance | 11.2 | 6.5 | +4.7 | 42 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 39% | 10% | +29 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 39% | 13% | +26 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 20% | 11% | +9 |
| Security | 95% | 96% | -1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 2% | 2% | 0 |
| Governance rules | 20% | 13% | +7 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Amazon SES 79.1
- 2 Confluent 78.1
- 3 Microsoft Azure Cache For Redis 71.5
- 4 Microsoft Azure Cdn 68.9
- 5 Microsoft Azure Private Link 61
- 6 LaserData 57.6
- 7 Insforge 57.3
- 8 Timescale 53.3
- 9 Workspot 53.3
- 10 The San Francisco Compute Company 51.4
- 1 Insforge 57.7
- 2 Antimetal 54.3
- 3 The San Francisco Compute Company 53.4
- 4 Confluent 49.4
- 5 Workspot 43.1
- 6 Limrun 43
- 7 Microsoft Azure Cache For Redis 42.3
- 8 Amazon SES 38.1
- 9 Microsoft Azure Cdn 38
- 10 Equinix 35.3
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.