Cloud Infrastructure
Providers using this tag (40)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Developing 10 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 13 Limited public surface area
Emerging 7 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 6 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (5)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 1 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 2 Limited public surface area
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 40 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Cloud Infrastructure, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 37.5 | 17.9 | +19.6 | 40 |
| Contract Quality | 33.4 | 17.5 | +15.9 | 40 |
| Operational Transparency | 20.1 | 11.3 | +8.8 | 40 |
| Discoverability | 68.6 | 60.4 | +8.2 | 40 |
| Contract Governance | 13.5 | 6.4 | +7.1 | 40 |
| Access Clarity | 27.2 | 22.3 | +4.9 | 40 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 48% | 16% | +32 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 30% | 7% | +23 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 13% | 9% | +4 |
| Security | 93% | 88% | +5 |
| Arazzo workflows | 3% | 2% | +1 |
| Governance rules | 25% | 13% | +12 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Amazon SES 79.7
- 2 Timescale 57.2
- 3 Insforge 56.4
- 4 LaserData 56.2
- 5 The San Francisco Compute Company 55.2
- 6 Aptible 53.9
- 7 Antimetal 52.7
- 8 Terraform 50.4
- 9 Weka 49.7
- 10 ArangoDB 48.9
- 1 Insforge 59.9
- 2 Antimetal 55.8
- 3 The San Francisco Compute Company 53.4
- 4 Limrun 43
- 5 Amazon SES 41.6
- 6 Equinix 32.7
- 7 Terraform 31.8
- 8 Timescale 31.8
- 9 Weka 30.4
- 10 LaserData 28.8
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.