niche · 0.1 capabilitymarket resourcedomainschema

Virtualization

Score 18.6 / 100 40 providers +10 via APIs 17 APIs Search apis.io →
Business capabilities this tag reaches
Information Technology Management 3

Providers using this tag (40)

Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.

Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 10 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 13 Limited public surface area
Emerging 4 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 9 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored

APIs with this tag (17)

Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →

Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 4 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 6 Limited public surface area
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented

Companies reaching this through an API (10)

These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Virtualization” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.

Citrix NetScaler Dell Servers IBM Microsoft Windows Server NetApp NetBox NetBox Labs OpenInfra Foundation Palo Alto Networks Stripe

Score breakdown

Frequency
44.8
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
0.6
spread across providers
Quality lift
36.0
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
0.0
strength of nearest seed neighbor

Related tags

VMware 7 co-occurrences Virtual Machines 8 co-occurrences VDI 5 co-occurrences VMs 5 co-occurrences Hybrid Cloud 5 co-occurrences Volumes 6 co-occurrences Disaster Recovery 5 co-occurrences Hosts 5 co-occurrences

Where this tag comes from

Provider tag40
Api tag17

Cohort brief

Auto-generated

The 34 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Virtualization, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.

Providers
34
of 40 in the catalog
Mean Kin Score
34.3
+11.5 vs catalog 22.8
Mean Agent Readiness
16.7
+3.4 vs catalog 13.3
Spread
3.4–65.8
median 37.7 · σ 16
How the 34 split by band
Exemplar 0Strong 3Developing 10Thin 13Emerging 4Minimal 4
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
FacetThis cohortCatalogDifferenceScored
Developer Ergonomics 43.1 22.1 +21 34
Contract Quality 31.1 18.2 +12.9 34
Operational Transparency 22.9 12.4 +10.5 34
Discoverability 64.7 57.9 +6.8 34
Contract Governance 13.4 9.4 +4 34
Access Clarity 26.6 25 +1.6 34

A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.

What this cohort publishes
ArtifactThis cohortCatalogDifference
MCP server (any) 9% 16% -7
MCP server (first-party) 6% 14% -8
Agent Skills 0% 0% 0
OAuth scopes 9% 13% -4
Security 94% 98% -4
Arazzo workflows 0% 2% -2
Governance rules 63% 35% +28

mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.

Top by Kin Score
  1. 1 Nutanix 65.8
  2. 2 Cisco Intersight 63.2
  3. 3 Smol Machines 56.6
  4. 4 Slide 51.4
  5. 5 VMware 51.3
  6. 6 Broadcom 48.4
  7. 7 Oxide 47.8
  8. 8 Vers 47
  9. 9 ControlPlane 42
  10. 10 KubeVirt 41
Top by Agent Readiness
  1. 1 Broadcom 37.5
  2. 2 Scale Computing 35.5
  3. 3 Vers 29.9
  4. 4 Solaris Zones 29.8
  5. 5 Cisco Intersight 28.4
  6. 6 Oxide 28.1
  7. 7 Slide 25.6
  8. 8 Smol Machines 24.7
  9. 9 Apache CloudStack 24.6
  10. 10 Google Cloud VMware Engine 24.6
All 40 members of this roster resolve to a provider in the catalog; 34 carry a score (85%). The figures above describe the scored members only.
Coverage caveat. 26 of 34 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 7 November 2026, across 38912 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.

Work with this as data

Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.

MCP server

One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.

https://apis.io/mcp

Tools for tags

7 MCP tools reach this
  • find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.
  • get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.
  • cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.
  • cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.
  • apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.
  • resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.
  • find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
All 92 tools →

Call it yourself

curl for this page
This tag
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/virtualization"
All tags
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
As a scored cohort (paid plan)
The distribution (Pro)

Calls without X-API-Key need no key. Calls with it need a paid plan — get a key.

Get an API key

Free tier, no form to fill in. Signing in shares your email address with us — we store it to create your key and to recognise you if you sign in with another provider. See our Privacy Policy and Terms.

A second provider on the same verified email joins the account you already have.