Camera
CamerasCamera
Providers using this tag (25)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Developing 6 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 4 Limited public surface area
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 12 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (25)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 6 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 7 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 7 Limited public surface area
Emerging 3 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (13)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Camera” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 24 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Camera, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operational Transparency | 18.9 | 13.8 | +5.1 | 24 |
| Contract Quality | 22.7 | 17.8 | +4.9 | 24 |
| Discoverability | 62.5 | 58 | +4.5 | 24 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 27.2 | 23.3 | +3.9 | 24 |
| Contract Governance | 8.1 | 6.3 | +1.8 | 24 |
| Access Clarity | 23.5 | 26.5 | -3 | 24 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 13% | 15% | -2 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 8% | 13% | -5 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 21% | 12% | +9 |
| Security | 96% | 98% | -2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 4% | 2% | +2 |
| Governance rules | 8% | 13% | -5 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Snap 56.3
- 2 LVT 54.7
- 3 Verkada 50.5
- 4 Amazon Panorama 49.8
- 5 AngelCam 48.1
- 6 Spot AI 46
- 7 Ring 43.8
- 8 Google Nest Smart Device Management 41.5
- 9 Wyze 39.1
- 10 Eagle Eye Networks 38.4
- 1 AngelCam 40
- 2 Snap 37.9
- 3 Ring 34.5
- 4 Spot AI 33.3
- 5 Cisco Meraki 31.2
- 6 Amazon Panorama 30.6
- 7 Eagle Eye Networks 29.7
- 8 LVT 29.3
- 9 Transload 26.4
- 10 Verkada 26.1
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.