Physical Security
Providers using this tag (45)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 8 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 3 Limited public surface area
Emerging 10 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (2)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 2 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
46 providers carry this tag directly, and 46 counting the 1 narrower tag below — 1 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 44 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Physical Security, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Governance | 7.1 | 6.3 | +0.8 | 44 |
| Discoverability | 57.9 | 58.1 | -0.2 | 44 |
| Contract Quality | 16.9 | 17.6 | -0.7 | 44 |
| Access Clarity | 25.3 | 26.5 | -1.2 | 44 |
| Operational Transparency | 12.4 | 13.7 | -1.3 | 44 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 21 | 23.2 | -2.2 | 44 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 7% | 14% | -7 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 5% | 12% | -7 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 14% | 11% | +3 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 2% | 14% | -12 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Rhombus Systems 63.4
- 2 Nedap 61.2
- 3 LVT 54.7
- 4 Flock Safety 51.4
- 5 Verkada 50.5
- 6 Sign In Enterprise 50.3
- 7 Spot AI 46
- 8 Base Operations 42.3
- 9 Coram Ai 41
- 10 Door 40.7
- 1 Rhombus Systems 65.1
- 2 Sign In Enterprise 44.8
- 3 Flock Safety 36.5
- 4 Door 36.5
- 5 Spot AI 33.3
- 6 Nedap 31.5
- 7 Openpath 31
- 8 Eagle Eye Networks 29.7
- 9 LVT 29.3
- 10 Verkada 26.1
Coverage caveat. 44 of 44 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.