Backend-as-a-Service
Providers using this tag (25)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 6 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Emerging 6 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (4)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 2 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 22 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Backend-as-a-Service, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 48 | 24.5 | +23.5 | 22 |
| Operational Transparency | 28.8 | 13.2 | +15.6 | 22 |
| Contract Quality | 31 | 18.6 | +12.4 | 22 |
| Discoverability | 68.9 | 59.1 | +9.8 | 22 |
| Access Clarity | 34.4 | 30 | +4.4 | 22 |
| Contract Governance | 13.5 | 9.7 | +3.8 | 22 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 41% | 18% | +23 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 36% | 16% | +20 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 14% | 13% | +1 |
| Security | 100% | 99% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 1% | -1 |
| Governance rules | 55% | 36% | +19 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Dify 78.8
- 2 Insforge 63.7
- 3 Google Firebase 61.3
- 4 PlayFab 54.2
- 5 Toolhouse 50.2
- 6 Supabase 48.7
- 7 formcarry-com 44.7
- 8 Medable 44.1
- 9 Result 42.3
- 10 Nhost 38
- 1 Insforge 56.6
- 2 Supabase 48.1
- 3 Nhost 46.4
- 4 Xano 42.4
- 5 formcarry-com 42.3
- 6 Dify 40.8
- 7 Google Firebase 40.3
- 8 Result 38.5
- 9 Toolhouse 27.3
- 10 Parse 25.9
Coverage caveat. 15 of 22 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 14 November 2026, across 41591 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.