Backend-as-a-Service
BaaSBackend As A ServiceBackend as a ServiceBackend-As-A-ServiceBackend-as-a-Service
Providers using this tag (35)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 10 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 13 Limited public surface area
Emerging 7 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (7)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 2 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 3 Limited public surface area
Emerging 2 Early or largely undocumented
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 35 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Backend-as-a-Service, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 37.6 | 17.9 | +19.7 | 35 |
| Contract Quality | 35.8 | 17.5 | +18.3 | 35 |
| Operational Transparency | 27 | 11.3 | +15.7 | 35 |
| Discoverability | 72.1 | 60.4 | +11.7 | 35 |
| Access Clarity | 31.8 | 22.3 | +9.5 | 35 |
| Contract Governance | 6.3 | 6.4 | -0.1 | 35 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 26% | 16% | +10 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 11% | 7% | +4 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 14% | 9% | +5 |
| Security | 94% | 88% | +6 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 17% | 13% | +4 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Unit 73.3
- 2 Insforge 56.4
- 3 Toolhouse 52.1
- 4 PlayFab 49.8
- 5 Result 47.1
- 6 Marqeta 46.1
- 7 Medable 45.3
- 8 Cross River 44.9
- 9 Google Firebase 44.3
- 10 Firebase 43.9
- 1 Insforge 59.9
- 2 Marqeta 33.5
- 3 Unit 32.8
- 4 Celcoin 29.8
- 5 Supabase 29.6
- 6 Toolhouse 29
- 7 Parse 25.9
- 8 Column 25.8
- 9 Google Firebase 24.8
- 10 Cross River 24.4
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/backend-as-a-service"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/backend-as-a-service"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/backend-as-a-service/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.