Tiger Global Management
Tiger Global Management is an American investment firm founded in 2001 by Chase Coleman III, headquartered at 9 West 57th Street in New York City. It operates as a "crossover" platform that invests across both public and private markets, running a research-driven, long-term strategy to partner with high-quality, innovative technology companies across every stage of their lifecycle. Tiger Global concentrates on the global internet, software, consumer internet, and financial technology sectors, and its private/venture arm became one of the most prolific startup backers of the 2020-2022 boom, investing in 361 deals in 2021 alone and backing hundreds of growth-stage companies worldwide. Check sizes range from early-stage venture through very large growth and pre-IPO rounds, and the same team follows companies from private markets into the public markets and beyond. The firm reported roughly $55.9B in assets under management as of May 2024, and its portfolio spans North America, Europe, Latin America, India, and China. Notable investments include Stripe, ByteDance, Databricks, Coinbase, Nubank, Snowflake, UiPath, GitLab, and Flipkart.
Tiger Global Management has 32 portfolio companies tracked on the APIs.io network, of which 25 (78%) publish APIs indexed here. The remaining 7 are tracked as profiles without a published API on the network.
Its highest-rated API providers on the network are Snyk, OpenAI, Snowflake, Stripe, GitLab.
Portfolio on the Network
Portfolio companies that publish APIs indexed on APIs.io, grouped by their API Evangelist rating. Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 7 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Emerging 5 Early or largely undocumented
Properties
Portfolio
Where the firm publishes its investments
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 30 portfolio companies with APIs in the catalog, backed by Tiger Global Management, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 38 | 17.6 | +20.4 | 30 |
| Operational Transparency | 31.3 | 13.6 | +17.7 | 30 |
| Access Clarity | 42.9 | 26.4 | +16.5 | 30 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 39.4 | 23.1 | +16.3 | 30 |
| Contract Governance | 12.3 | 6.3 | +6 | 30 |
| Discoverability | 62.1 | 58.2 | +3.9 | 30 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 43% | 15% | +28 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 40% | 12% | +28 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 30% | 11% | +19 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 20% | 2% | +18 |
| Governance rules | 43% | 13% | +30 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
Coverage caveat. 19 of 30 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 3 October 2026, across 28834 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Source (apis.yml)
Work with this as data
Every firm here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.