HV Capital
HV Capital is one of Europe's leading early-stage and growth venture capital firms, headquartered in Munich with an office in Berlin. Founded in 2000 as Holtzbrinck Ventures (the venture arm associated with Verlagsgruppe Georg von Holtzbrinck), the partnership completed a management buyout and rebranded to HV Capital in 2018, establishing full operational and investment independence. The firm backs European founders with global ambitions across the full lifecycle: its Venture fund writes seed and Series A checks from roughly €500K to €10M, while its Growth fund invests through Series B and beyond with checks up to €60M and follow-on reserves reaching €100M per company. HV invests across consumer internet, enterprise software and SaaS, fintech, deep tech, healthcare, climate and energy, cybersecurity, and AI. The firm reports more than €2.8B in assets under management across nine fund generations spanning Venture and Growth, over 290 portfolio companies, and 12 IPOs. Its investment philosophy — "too new is our baseline, too bold is our reason, too complex is our edge" — reflects a willingness to back complex, category-defining companies. Early and notable investments include Zalando, Delivery Hero, FlixBus, SumUp, Depop, Scalable Capital, Enpal, and Isar Aerospace. This profile tracks HV Capital's identity and its portfolio graph across the API Evangelist network.
HV Capital has 141 portfolio companies tracked on the APIs.io network, of which 141 (100%) publish APIs indexed here.
Its highest-rated API providers on the network are Qonto, Cogny, Upvest, Cello, Quandoo.
Portfolio on the Network
Portfolio companies that publish APIs indexed on APIs.io, grouped by their API Evangelist rating. Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Developing 22 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Emerging 54 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 52 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
Properties
Portfolio
Where the firm publishes its investments
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 140 portfolio companies with APIs in the catalog, backed by HV Capital, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 25.2 | 22.3 | +2.9 | 140 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 19.2 | 17.9 | +1.3 | 140 |
| Discoverability | 61.1 | 60.4 | +0.7 | 140 |
| Operational Transparency | 11 | 11.3 | -0.3 | 140 |
| Contract Governance | 5.6 | 6.4 | -0.8 | 140 |
| Contract Quality | 13 | 17.5 | -4.5 | 140 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 21% | 16% | +5 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 9% | 7% | +2 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 11% | 9% | +2 |
| Security | 95% | 88% | +7 |
| Arazzo workflows | 2% | 2% | 0 |
| Governance rules | 4% | 13% | -9 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
Source (apis.yml)
Work with this as data
Every firm here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.