Virtual Cards
Providers using this tag (27)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 8 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 5 Limited public surface area
Minimal 4 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (11)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 4 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 2 Limited public surface area
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 27 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Virtual Cards, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 32.6 | 17.9 | +14.7 | 27 |
| Access Clarity | 36.4 | 22.3 | +14.1 | 27 |
| Contract Quality | 29.6 | 17.5 | +12.1 | 27 |
| Discoverability | 69.8 | 60.4 | +9.4 | 27 |
| Operational Transparency | 19.4 | 11.3 | +8.1 | 27 |
| Contract Governance | 8.9 | 6.4 | +2.5 | 27 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 26% | 16% | +10 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 15% | 7% | +8 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 15% | 9% | +6 |
| Security | 100% | 88% | +12 |
| Arazzo workflows | 7% | 2% | +5 |
| Governance rules | 11% | 13% | -2 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Highnote 75.4
- 2 Agentcard 59.1
- 3 Simplifi/Simplifipay 56.1
- 4 Allowance 55.9
- 5 ConnexPay 54.5
- 6 Bond 49.4
- 7 Klutch 46.9
- 8 Mastercard 46.2
- 9 Codat 45.6
- 10 Emburse 43
- 1 Agentcard 68.3
- 2 Allowance 49.6
- 3 Klutch 44.1
- 4 ConnexPay 41.2
- 5 Codat 39.2
- 6 Lead Bank 38.8
- 7 Highnote 32.9
- 8 Mastercard 32.4
- 9 Simplifi/Simplifipay 30
- 10 Emburse 28.1
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.