Topics
Topicstopics
Providers using this tag (51)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 9 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 20 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 17 Limited public surface area
Emerging 3 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (50)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 9 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 19 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 17 Limited public surface area
Emerging 3 Early or largely undocumented
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 51 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Topics, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 57.4 | 17.5 | +39.9 | 51 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 40 | 17.9 | +22.1 | 51 |
| Access Clarity | 42.6 | 22.3 | +20.3 | 51 |
| Operational Transparency | 30.5 | 11.3 | +19.2 | 51 |
| Contract Governance | 15.9 | 6.4 | +9.5 | 51 |
| Discoverability | 68.9 | 60.4 | +8.5 | 51 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 29% | 16% | +13 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 14% | 7% | +7 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 27% | 9% | +18 |
| Security | 98% | 88% | +10 |
| Arazzo workflows | 12% | 2% | +10 |
| Governance rules | 59% | 13% | +46 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Common Room 67.7
- 2 Novu 66.6
- 3 GitHub 62.4
- 4 Clari 60.9
- 5 YouScan 59.8
- 6 Red Hat 59.1
- 7 Omni 58.3
- 8 Zendesk 58.1
- 9 Gladly 57
- 10 Foxglove Technologies 56.3
- 1 Common Room 60.8
- 2 Red Hat 52.3
- 3 GitHub 45.5
- 4 Signal AI 43.9
- 5 Omni 36.5
- 6 Foxglove Technologies 35.9
- 7 Zendesk 35.9
- 8 VAST Data 35.1
- 9 ETH Zurich – Swiss Federal Institute of Technology 35
- 10 Clari 34.9
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/topics"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/topics"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/topics/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.