Spain
Providers using this tag (41)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Developing 6 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 5 Limited public surface area
Emerging 13 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 16 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (3)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Thin 3 Limited public surface area
Companies reaching this through an API (1)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Spain” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 39 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Spain, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 31.6 | 26.5 | +5.1 | 39 |
| Discoverability | 63 | 58.1 | +4.9 | 39 |
| Operational Transparency | 16.5 | 13.7 | +2.8 | 39 |
| Contract Governance | 8.2 | 6.3 | +1.9 | 39 |
| Contract Quality | 18 | 17.6 | +0.4 | 39 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 23.1 | 23.2 | -0.1 | 39 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 10% | 14% | -4 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 13% | 12% | +1 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 5% | 11% | -6 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 13% | 14% | -1 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 OpenMercantil 80.6
- 2 Claix 53.3
- 3 Factorial 52.8
- 4 Clevergy 51
- 5 Hergert Synthora 48.5
- 6 Multiverse Computing 47.9
- 7 Cobee by Pluxee 44.7
- 8 ZenRows 40.9
- 9 ES·pera API 31.7
- 10 Koalaboox 29.5
- 1 Factorial 51
- 2 OpenMercantil 46.6
- 3 Holded 42.1
- 4 Claix 40.7
- 5 Hergert Synthora 33.8
- 6 ES·pera API 32.1
- 7 Clevergy 30.8
- 8 Cobee by Pluxee 30.7
- 9 Multiverse Computing 27.6
- 10 Autonomous University of Barcelona 26.7
Coverage caveat. 29 of 39 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.