Ordering
Business capabilities this tag reaches
Supply Chain Management 1
Providers using this tag (26)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Developing 4 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 10 Limited public surface area
Emerging 7 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 5 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (19)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 4 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
AT&T Alliance Wireline APIsWireline business APIs enabling partners to expedite quoting, service qualification, and ordering of AT&T w...Telia Finland Mobile Subscription Order Service APIExposes available packages and products and allows ordering them for both new and existing mobile subscript...Telia LSO Sonata Order Management APICreates product orders covering new, change, disconnect and suspend scenarios, with the current version foc...Ankorstore Ordering APIℹ️ This section of API allows to manage different types of orders in the system. Depending on the order typ...
Thin 2 Limited public surface area
Emerging 10 Early or largely undocumented
Zerocater API v3The internal-but-anonymously-discoverable JSON API behind the Zerocater ordering application at app.zerocat...Natera Connect Clinician PortalWeb portal (Women's Health, Oncology, Organ Health, Rare Disease) for clinicians to order kits and supplies...Laundryheap GraphQL APILaundryheap's primary product API. A single GraphQL endpoint serving the consumer web and mobile apps, cove...Weyerhaeuser APIWeyerhaeuser's API Management platform enabling partner and customer integration with wood products orderin...Tabit Orders APIOrder capture and management across Tabit's mobile POS (PAD), online ordering (Order), kiosk, and delivery ...WOW! Momo App BackendA first-party application backend on api.wowmomo.com behind an AWS Application Load Balancer, running an Ex...TMF931 — Onboarding And OrderingTM Forum TMF931 Onboarding And Ordering Open API exposed as part of the GSMA Open Gateway Operate APIs, so ...US Foods MOXe eCommerce PlatformUS Foods MOXe is a comprehensive foodservice eCommerce platform enabling restaurants, healthcare facilities...QXO Order APIEnables customers to place material orders and track order status and deliveries within their own systems.Zoetis Direct Integrated OrderingZoetis Direct Integrated Ordering provides veterinary practices with an API integration for placing orders ...
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (14)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Ordering” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Airbus OneAtlas
AT&T
BT Group
Mavenir
Natera
Orange Business
QXO Building Products
Telia Company
US Foods
Vantor
Vodafone
Weyerhaeuser
WOW! Momo
Zoetis
Score breakdown
Frequency
45.6
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
0.7
spread across providers
Quality lift
33.7
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
0.0
strength of nearest seed neighbor
Related tags
TM Forum 5 co-occurrences
CAMARA 6 co-occurrences
Open Gateway 5 co-occurrences
Network APIs 5 co-occurrences
Wholesale 6 co-occurrences
Restaurant 15 co-occurrences
5G 5 co-occurrences
Broadband 5 co-occurrences
Where this tag comes from
Provider tag26
Api tag20
Openapi tag1
Openapi op tag7
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 25 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Ordering, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
Providers
25
of 26 in the catalog
Mean Kin Score
28.5
+5.6 vs catalog 22.9
Mean Agent Readiness
18.6
+6.7 vs catalog 11.9
Spread
3.4–52.5
median 33.2 · σ 13.2
How the 25 split by band
Exemplar 0Strong 0Developing 4Thin 10Emerging 7Minimal 4
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 31 | 17.6 | +13.4 | 25 |
| Discoverability | 63.3 | 58.1 | +5.2 | 25 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 28 | 23.2 | +4.8 | 25 |
| Contract Governance | 6.9 | 6.3 | +0.6 | 25 |
| Access Clarity | 27 | 26.5 | +0.5 | 25 |
| Operational Transparency | 12.9 | 13.7 | -0.8 | 25 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
What this cohort publishes
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 4% | 14% | -10 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 4% | 12% | -8 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 20% | 11% | +9 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 4% | 2% | +2 |
| Governance rules | 16% | 14% | +2 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
Top by Kin Score
- 1 PartsTech 52.5
- 2 Zayo 43.9
- 3 Ankorstore 43.2
- 4 Opply 40.2
- 5 REKKI 38.8
- 6 Texas Instruments 38.7
- 7 Quartzy 38.5
- 8 BlueCart 38.4
- 9 MealMe 37
- 10 UrbanPiper 37
Top by Agent Readiness
- 1 Opply 44.4
- 2 Ankorstore 39
- 3 Zayo 35.8
- 4 SpecCheck 32.6
- 5 PartsTech 30.8
- 6 Texas Instruments 27.7
- 7 2ndKitchen 27
- 8 BlueCart 24.8
- 9 MealMe 24.7
- 10 Quartzy 24.5
All 26 members of this roster resolve to a provider in the
catalog; 25 carry a score (96%).
The figures above describe the scored members only.
Coverage caveat. 18 of 25 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Coverage caveat. 18 of 25 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.