Influencer Marketing
Providers using this tag (48)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 6 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 9 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Emerging 15 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (8)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 6 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 2 Limited public surface area
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 46 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Influencer Marketing, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 45.6 | 26.5 | +19.1 | 46 |
| Operational Transparency | 20.2 | 13.7 | +6.5 | 46 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 28.5 | 23.2 | +5.3 | 46 |
| Discoverability | 61.8 | 58.1 | +3.7 | 46 |
| Contract Quality | 21 | 17.6 | +3.4 | 46 |
| Contract Governance | 9.4 | 6.3 | +3.1 | 46 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 28% | 14% | +14 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 28% | 12% | +16 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 30% | 11% | +19 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 9% | 14% | -5 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Impact 71.4
- 2 Tapfiliate 69.8
- 3 KonbiniAPI 65.1
- 4 FirstPromoter 64.3
- 5 CreatorIQ 61.9
- 6 Mention 61.9
- 7 Refersion 59.8
- 8 Pomo 55.7
- 9 Storyclash 54
- 10 Archive Technologies 53.2
- 1 FirstPromoter 62.5
- 2 Impact 56.4
- 3 KonbiniAPI 56.1
- 4 toksta 53.3
- 5 Tapfiliate 52.3
- 6 Nectar Social 50
- 7 Archive Technologies 47.8
- 8 Pomo 39.3
- 9 LoudCrowd 34.7
- 10 CreatorIQ 34
Coverage caveat. 39 of 46 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.