niche · 0.5

YouTube

Score 20.0 / 100 38 providers +25 via APIs 25 APIs Search apis.io →
Business capabilities this tag reaches
Data & Reference Information Services 3

Providers using this tag (38)

Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.

Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 4 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 5 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 12 Limited public surface area
Emerging 9 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 6 Almost no public developer surface

APIs with this tag (25)

Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →

Strong 5 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 14 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 5 Limited public surface area
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented

Companies reaching this through an API (25)

These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “YouTube” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.

AnyAPI apidirect-io captapi-com Chocodata Condé Nast creatordb-app dataleads-pro FastAF fetcher-sh ffmpegapi-net HonestHook LurkAPI MCP360 Monocrawl NationGraph OD. Media & Technology postproxy-dev replynodes-com scraper-api-com Social Fetch SocialCrawl SocialListeningAPI stophy-dev vee3-io Viberate

Score breakdown

Frequency
49.3
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
0.6
spread across providers
Quality lift
37.7
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
0.0
strength of nearest seed neighbor

Related tags

TikTok 24 co-occurrences Instagram 21 co-occurrences Facebook 14 co-occurrences Pinterest 11 co-occurrences Reddit 13 co-occurrences Bluesky 9 co-occurrences LinkedIn 13 co-occurrences Spotify 9 co-occurrences

Where this tag comes from

Provider tag38
Api tag25
Openapi tag10
Openapi op tag54

Cohort brief

Auto-generated

The 30 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged YouTube, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.

Providers
30
of 38 in the catalog
Mean Kin Score
33.7
+10.9 vs catalog 22.8
Mean Agent Readiness
27.5
+14.2 vs catalog 13.3
Spread
3.4–75
median 32.1 · σ 19.2
How the 30 split by band
Exemplar 2Strong 4Developing 4Thin 9Emerging 7Minimal 4
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
FacetThis cohortCatalogDifferenceScored
Access Clarity 42.2 25 +17.2 30
Operational Transparency 23.8 12.4 +11.4 30
Developer Ergonomics 31.8 22.1 +9.7 30
Contract Quality 27.4 18.2 +9.2 30
Contract Governance 14.8 9.4 +5.4 30
Discoverability 60.2 57.9 +2.3 30

A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.

What this cohort publishes
ArtifactThis cohortCatalogDifference
MCP server (any) 37% 16% +21
MCP server (first-party) 40% 14% +26
Agent Skills 0% 0% 0
OAuth scopes 30% 13% +17
Security 100% 98% +2
Arazzo workflows 3% 2% +1
Governance rules 60% 35% +25

mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.

Top by Kin Score
  1. 1 SerpApi 75
  2. 2 TranscriptFetch 70.9
  3. 3 YouTube 62.6
  4. 4 MediaCaption API 58.1
  5. 5 Arcmira 57.2
  6. 6 Dynamoi 54.9
  7. 7 toksta 50.7
  8. 8 StreamElements 46.4
  9. 9 transcriptdock-com 44.7
  10. 10 acornonaut-app 40.8
Top by Agent Readiness
  1. 1 Arcmira 70.6
  2. 2 TranscriptFetch 56.9
  3. 3 toksta 54.3
  4. 4 MediaCaption API 47
  5. 5 dopost 46.5
  6. 6 scripthaul-com 45.5
  7. 7 YouTube 43.4
  8. 8 SerpApi 41.9
  9. 9 Dynamoi 38.4
  10. 10 transcriptout-com 36.9
All 38 members of this roster resolve to a provider in the catalog; 30 carry a score (79%). The figures above describe the scored members only.
Coverage caveat. 18 of 30 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 7 November 2026, across 38912 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.

Work with this as data

Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.

MCP server

One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.

https://apis.io/mcp

Tools for tags

7 MCP tools reach this
  • find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.
  • get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.
  • cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.
  • cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.
  • apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.
  • resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.
  • find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
All 92 tools →

Call it yourself

curl for this page
This tag
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/youtube"
All tags
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
As a scored cohort (paid plan)
The distribution (Pro)

Calls without X-API-Key need no key. Calls with it need a paid plan — get a key.

Get an API key

Free tier, no form to fill in. Signing in shares your email address with us — we store it to create your key and to recognise you if you sign in with another provider. See our Privacy Policy and Terms.

A second provider on the same verified email joins the account you already have.