Providers using this tag (25)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 11 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 8 Limited public surface area
Emerging 2 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (23)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 10 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 7 Limited public surface area
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 25 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Hub, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 54.1 | 17.5 | +36.6 | 25 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 42.3 | 17.9 | +24.4 | 25 |
| Operational Transparency | 29.9 | 11.3 | +18.6 | 25 |
| Discoverability | 72.7 | 60.4 | +12.3 | 25 |
| Access Clarity | 33.3 | 22.3 | +11 | 25 |
| Contract Governance | 14.7 | 6.4 | +8.3 | 25 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 28% | 16% | +12 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 12% | 7% | +5 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 28% | 9% | +19 |
| Security | 100% | 88% | +12 |
| Arazzo workflows | 16% | 2% | +14 |
| Governance rules | 44% | 13% | +31 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Dynatrace 71.8
- 2 Autodesk 60.2
- 3 RingCentral 58.2
- 4 Plex 55.3
- 5 Cabify 54
- 6 TetraScience 52.9
- 7 Azure Web PubSub 52.1
- 8 Continue 49.4
- 9 Pandium 47.6
- 10 Bump.sh 47.3
- 1 Plex 62.4
- 2 Autodesk 43.2
- 3 RingCentral 41.4
- 4 Cabify 37.2
- 5 BNSF 34.2
- 6 Autodesk Fusion 33.1
- 7 Bump.sh 32.4
- 8 Dynatrace 32.4
- 9 Newforma 32.2
- 10 Continue 24.8
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/hub"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/hub"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/hub/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.