DNS
DNSDnsdns
Providers using this tag (50)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 7 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 14 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 14 Limited public surface area
Emerging 10 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 3 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (55)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 4 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 14 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 14 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 15 Limited public surface area
Emerging 7 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (27)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “DNS” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 48 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged DNS, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 43.6 | 19.8 | +23.8 | 48 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 45.5 | 23.4 | +22.1 | 48 |
| Operational Transparency | 24.3 | 14 | +10.3 | 48 |
| Access Clarity | 36.1 | 26.5 | +9.6 | 48 |
| Discoverability | 68.1 | 61.2 | +6.9 | 48 |
| Contract Governance | 7.8 | 6.4 | +1.4 | 48 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 23% | 10% | +13 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 23% | 13% | +10 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 15% | 11% | +4 |
| Security | 100% | 97% | +3 |
| Arazzo workflows | 4% | 2% | +2 |
| Governance rules | 25% | 14% | +11 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Shodan 67.2
- 2 WhoisFreaks 66.6
- 3 Cloudflare 65.1
- 4 cPanel 63.6
- 5 Geekflare 60.9
- 6 Cisco Umbrella 59.3
- 7 APIFreaks - API Hub for Developers 58.2
- 8 Amazon Route 53 56.9
- 9 DomScan 56.7
- 10 Amazon Route 53 Resolver 49.8
- 1 cPanel 55.9
- 2 Cloudflare 49.6
- 3 uChecker 45.1
- 4 DomainTools 39
- 5 DomScan 37.6
- 6 Unstoppable Domains 36.7
- 7 APIFreaks - API Hub for Developers 35.9
- 8 Geekflare 34.9
- 9 Spaceship 33.2
- 10 QuantCDN 32.3
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.