Markets · bedrock market · provisional
Official SDKs on Package Registries
Distribution market (official client libraries per language; providers ranked). The Kin Score Market layer reads each provider in its market: who it integrates with, how deep those integrations go, and where the market publishes its own structure. Methodology.
43providers measured
34 (79.1%)declare their own
3 (7.0%)covered by others only
6 (14.0%)distribution only (sell through, not integrations)
0 (0.0%)undeclared
22declare compatibility (report only, not weighted)
15in-market workflows shown
Provisional. Provisional and unweighted: the Market layer is not part of the composite or agent readiness. Leader lists are read within a position, never as one ranking. A provider that declares nothing we can
read is shown as undeclared, with no number: we never infer integrations.
Where this market publishes its structure
- npm registry (registry.npmjs.org/
/latest + abbreviated doc) machine-readable, 8,543 candidates; 2,991 linked packages / 1,238 providers; 4,594 held; 142 not on registry; 6 unreadable - PyPI JSON (pypi.org/pypi/
/json) machine-readable, 2,845 candidates; 693 linked / 523 providers; 2,108 held; 45 missing; 2 unreadable; PyPI JSON exposes no organisation, publisher = author/maintainer e-mail - Go module proxy (proxy.golang.org/
/@latest) machine-readable, 920 candidates; 566 linked / 386 providers; 309 held; 38 missing; 19 unreadable (proxy errors / invalid module paths) - Maven Central (repo1.maven.org maven-metadata.xml + POM) machine-readable, 1,158 candidates; 447 linked / 226 providers; 580 held; 96 missing; 56 unreadable (POM / metadata fetch failures)
- NuGet (api.nuget.org registration + azuresearch owners) machine-readable, 627 candidates; 138 linked / 89 providers; 487 held; 14 missing; 7 unreadable
- RubyGems (rubygems.org/api/v1 gems + owners) machine-readable, 599 candidates; 128 linked / 102 providers; 478 held; 7 missing
- crates.io (crates.io/api/v1 crates + owners) machine-readable, 402 candidates; 45 linked / 26 providers; 351 held; 8 missing; paced 1 req/s per crates.io policy
- Packagist / CocoaPods / pub.dev / Hex not machine-readable: not swept this pass: the catalog's packages files carry too few entries for these registries to verify (2026-10-19)
Own = declares at least one integration itself; covered = visible only because an aggregator, standards body, regulator or partner contract names it; distribution-only = listed only on cloud marketplaces it sells through, a channel reported beside, never counted as its own declared integrations; undeclared = nothing we can read, so no number; declares_compatibility = providers with a `compatible` shape vote, report only (kin, 2026-10-13): never counted as own, never in depth or position.
Taxonomy how this market maps onto apis.io
Derived 2026-10-23 from the 43 providers in this market we could resolve in the catalog. The percentage is the share of those providers carrying each one; it describes the market, not the tag or industry. Tag groups have no page of their own yet, so they are listed unlinked.
| Tags | Developer Tools 23%, MCP 21% |
|---|---|
| Tag groups | MCP 30%, Developer Tools 23% |
| Industries | Developer Tools & DevOps 35%, Artificial Intelligence 33%, Cybersecurity & Identity 28%, Data & Analytics 21% |
| Areas | Authentication 12% |
| Capabilities | Developer Platform & API Ecosystem Management 28%, Cybersecurity Management 23%, Software Release & Deployment Management 21% |
share of resolved cohort carrying it; tags >=0.20 & >=3 members (max 12, junk dropped), tag_groups >=0.20 (cooccurrence, non-cross-cutting; max 8), industries >=0.20 (max 6), areas >=0.10 (max 6; areas are keyword-matched and sparse), capabilities L1 >=0.20 (max 8); derive-market-taxonomy.py
Leaders by position (provisional)
Provisional: grouped by position, depth compared within a position only. Distribution (cloud marketplaces) and iPaaS bridges are counted beside position, never inside it. Unknown-builder listings are left out of position shares and counted here.
gravity 2 · other companies invest to build on it
| Provider | Depth | Integrations | In / out | Unknown builder | Distribution | iPaaS bridge | Mix |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stripe | 70.6 | 959 | 819 / 140 | 0 | 11 | 37 | partner-built 89%, provider-built 2%, ipaas-bridge 4%, contract 2%, standard 1%, builds-on-platform 1%, distribution 1% |
| Adyen | 60.6 | 106 | 44 / 62 | 0 | 9 | 3 | partner-built 59%, provider-built 12%, ipaas-bridge 3%, contract 10%, standard 6%, builds-on-platform 2%, distribution 8% |
builds-on 18 · publishes apps on other platforms' stores
| Provider | Depth | Integrations | In / out | Unknown builder | Distribution | iPaaS bridge | Mix |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LaunchDarkly | 55.2 | 43 | 0 / 43 | 0 | 10 | 5 | ipaas-bridge 12%, contract 5%, standard 7%, covered 12%, builds-on-platform 42%, distribution 23% |
| Keeper Security | 55.1 | 28 | 0 / 28 | 0 | 10 | 0 | contract 3%, standard 21%, builds-on-platform 41%, distribution 34% |
| Algolia | 54.2 | 47 | 0 / 47 | 0 | 12 | 14 | own-page 10%, ipaas-bridge 29%, standard 4%, covered 4%, builds-on-platform 27%, distribution 25% |
| Statsig | 52.4 | 23 | 0 / 23 | 0 | 7 | 2 | ipaas-bridge 9%, standard 4%, covered 13%, builds-on-platform 43%, distribution 30% |
| Sentry | 52.1 | 31 | 0 / 31 | 0 | 13 | 4 | ipaas-bridge 12%, standard 9%, covered 6%, builds-on-platform 33%, distribution 39% |
| DevCycle | 51.8 | 18 | 0 / 18 | 0 | 8 | 1 | ipaas-bridge 5%, standard 16%, builds-on-platform 37%, distribution 42% |
| Contentstack | 49.2 | 18 | 0 / 18 | 0 | 9 | 2 | ipaas-bridge 11%, standard 5%, covered 5%, builds-on-platform 32%, distribution 47% |
| Bugsnag | 47.7 | 18 | 0 / 18 | 0 | 9 | 2 | ipaas-bridge 11%, standard 11%, covered 11%, builds-on-platform 21%, distribution 47% |
| Flagsmith | 47.1 | 16 | 0 / 16 | 0 | 9 | 0 | standard 6%, builds-on-platform 41%, distribution 53% |
| Mollie | 46.6 | 16 | 0 / 16 | 0 | 6 | 2 | ipaas-bridge 12%, contract 19%, covered 6%, builds-on-platform 25%, distribution 38% |
| Fortanix | 41.7 | 10 | 0 / 10 | 0 | 5 | 0 | standard 20%, builds-on-platform 30%, distribution 50% |
| Svix | 40.2 | 15 | 0 / 15 | 0 | 9 | 2 | ipaas-bridge 12%, standard 12%, builds-on-platform 19%, distribution 56% |
| MailerLite | 38.5 | 48 | 0 / 48 | 0 | 5 | 36 | ipaas-bridge 78%, contract 2%, covered 2%, builds-on-platform 7%, distribution 11% |
| Factset | 37.6 | 11 | 0 / 11 | 0 | 7 | 0 | standard 9%, coverage 9%, builds-on-platform 18%, distribution 64% |
| Skyflow | 33.4 | 5 | 0 / 5 | 0 | 4 | 0 | builds-on-platform 20%, distribution 80% |
| WhoisFreaks | 33.4 | 13 | 0 / 13 | 0 | 8 | 3 | ipaas-bridge 23%, builds-on-platform 15%, distribution 62% |
| Bitculator | 32.6 | 6 | 0 / 6 | 0 | 5 | 0 | builds-on-platform 17%, distribution 83% |
| Chalk | 32.6 | 6 | 0 / 6 | 0 | 5 | 0 | builds-on-platform 17%, distribution 83% |
coverage 3 · reaches banks, carriers, systems or channels (an aggregator)
| Provider | Depth | Integrations | In / out | Unknown builder | Distribution | iPaaS bridge | Mix |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RudderStack | 51.4 | 39 | 0 / 39 | 0 | 8 | 0 | coverage 62%, covered 3%, builds-on-platform 15%, distribution 21% |
| Telesign | 31.8 | 11 | 0 / 11 | 0 | 6 | 2 | ipaas-bridge 18%, coverage 27%, distribution 55% |
| SignalWire | 25.9 | 9 | 0 / 9 | 0 | 6 | 2 | ipaas-bridge 22%, coverage 11%, distribution 67% |
covered 1 · reached mainly through aggregators
| Provider | Depth | Integrations | In / out | Unknown builder | Distribution | iPaaS bridge | Mix |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dinari | 33.7 | 5 | 0 / 5 | 0 | 4 | 0 | covered 20%, distribution 80% |
regulated 1 · named in a regulator's register or partners' contracts
| Provider | Depth | Integrations | In / out | Unknown builder | Distribution | iPaaS bridge | Mix |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stark Bank | 32.9 | 7 | 0 / 7 | 0 | 6 | 0 | contract 14%, distribution 86% |
standard 7 · listed by a voluntary standard's own directory
| Provider | Depth | Integrations | In / out | Unknown builder | Distribution | iPaaS bridge | Mix |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yugabyte | 45.8 | 13 | 0 / 13 | 0 | 6 | 0 | standard 31%, covered 8%, builds-on-platform 15%, distribution 46% |
| Authlete | 39.9 | 11 | 0 / 11 | 0 | 7 | 0 | standard 18%, builds-on-platform 18%, distribution 64% |
| APIMatic | 37.5 | 9 | 0 / 9 | 0 | 7 | 0 | standard 20%, builds-on-platform 10%, distribution 70% |
| IPinfo | 35.3 | 13 | 0 / 13 | 0 | 9 | 2 | ipaas-bridge 15%, standard 8%, builds-on-platform 8%, distribution 69% |
| Evervault | 34.1 | 9 | 0 / 9 | 0 | 5 | 1 | ipaas-bridge 11%, standard 33%, distribution 56% |
| Qiniu Cloud | 31.6 | 8 | 0 / 8 | 0 | 7 | 0 | standard 12%, distribution 88% |
| WebScraping.AI | 26.8 | 10 | 0 / 10 | 0 | 8 | 2 | ipaas-bridge 18%, standard 9%, distribution 73% |
mixed 5 · no single mode dominates
| Provider | Depth | Integrations | In / out | Unknown builder | Distribution | iPaaS bridge | Mix |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OpenAI | 55.6 | 73 | 0 / 73 | 1 | 6 | 35 | ipaas-bridge 49%, contract 4%, standard 10%, covered 17%, builds-on-platform 10%, distribution 8%, unknown 1% |
| Anthropic | 54.2 | 31 | 0 / 31 | 1 | 10 | 2 | ipaas-bridge 6%, contract 10%, standard 16%, covered 16%, builds-on-platform 16%, distribution 32%, unknown 3% |
| AfterShip | 53.5 | 30 | 0 / 30 | 0 | 7 | 1 | provider-built 3%, own-page 42%, ipaas-bridge 3%, builds-on-platform 29%, distribution 23% |
| Talon.One | 39.6 | 9 | 0 / 9 | 0 | 4 | 1 | ipaas-bridge 11%, standard 11%, covered 22%, builds-on-platform 11%, distribution 44% |
| Appwrite | 31.0 | 11 | 0 / 11 | 0 | 9 | 1 | ipaas-bridge 8%, standard 8%, covered 8%, distribution 75% |
distribution 6 · only sells through cloud marketplaces
| Provider | Depth | Integrations | In / out | Unknown builder | Distribution | iPaaS bridge | Mix |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Featureflip | 28.8 | 6 | 0 / 6 | 0 | 6 | 0 | distribution 100% |
| ForceDream | 28.8 | 5 | 0 / 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | distribution 100% |
| Incognia | 28.8 | 6 | 0 / 6 | 0 | 6 | 0 | distribution 100% |
| Intrinio | 28.8 | 5 | 0 / 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | distribution 100% |
| ReqKey | 28.8 | 6 | 0 / 6 | 0 | 6 | 0 | distribution 100% |
| AxonFlow | 28.7 | 4 | 0 / 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | distribution 100% |
Top workflows by market votes
Workflows (Arazzo) and their phrasing are generated by API Evangelist, ranked by market votes (integration edges in the graph, weighted by channel).
In-market workflows only: a step on the market provider's side maps to this market's business capabilities (), and the partner is not a generic export/notify app. Other workflows are counted as bridges (including any whose steps do not resolve to a capability yet). Methodology. In-market: 71; bridges: 0.
| Workflow | Between | Votes | Weighted | Arazzo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Push Stripe successful charges as HubSpot deals When a Stripe charge succeeds, look up the matching HubSpot Contact and create a Closed Won HubSpot Deal with the charge amount and currency. |
Stripe ↔ HubSpot | 2 | 2.0 | workflow generated by API Evangelist |
| Sync Stripe customers into Salesforce contacts When a Stripe customer is created, look them up by email and create the matching Salesforce Contact with billing details. |
Stripe ↔ Salesforce | 2 | 2.0 | workflow generated by API Evangelist |
| Replace WooCommerce Stripe plugin with declarative integration List WooCommerce store orders and create a matching Stripe payment intent for a selected order's total and currency. |
Stripe ↔ WooCommerce | 2 | 1.9 | workflow generated by API Evangelist |
| Commercetools |
Adyen ↔ commercetools | 3 | 1.8 | workflow generated by API Evangelist |
| commercetools Discover how the Adyen payments integration for commercetools can optimize your ecommerce conversions |
Adyen ↔ commercetools | 3 | 1.8 | workflow generated by API Evangelist |
| commercetools |
Algolia ↔ commercetools | 3 | 1.8 | workflow generated by API Evangelist |
| Get Slack notifications for new Stripe sales Get Slack notifications for new Stripe sales |
Stripe ↔ Slack | 3 | 1.8 | workflow generated by API Evangelist |
| Post Stripe payment alerts to Slack channels Retrieve a Stripe charge and post a payment alert to a designated Slack channel. |
Stripe ↔ Slack | 3 | 1.8 | workflow generated by API Evangelist |
| Post failed Stripe payments to Slack Post failed Stripe payments to Slack |
Stripe ↔ Slack | 3 | 1.8 | workflow generated by API Evangelist |
| plaid |
Adyen ↔ Plaid | 2 | 1.8 | workflow generated by API Evangelist |
| Add Stripe Checkout completers to a Mailchimp audience When a Stripe Checkout session completes, subscribe the buyer to a Mailchimp audience with plan and MRR merge tags. |
Stripe ↔ Mailchimp | 2 | 1.4 | workflow generated by API Evangelist |
| Add new Stripe customers to Mailchimp lists Add new Stripe customers to Mailchimp lists |
Stripe ↔ Mailchimp | 2 | 1.4 | workflow generated by API Evangelist |
| Attach Stripe customer history to Zendesk tickets On ticket open, fetch the requester's Stripe customer and recent charges and open a Zendesk ticket enriched with that billing history. |
Stripe ↔ Zendesk | 2 | 1.4 | workflow generated by API Evangelist |
| Create Xero invoices for new Stripe payments Create Xero invoices for new Stripe payments |
Stripe ↔ Xero | 2 | 1.4 | workflow generated by API Evangelist |
| File Stripe sales through TaxJar Sync paid Stripe invoices to TaxJar as order transactions for automated sales tax filing. |
Stripe ↔ TaxJar | 2 | 1.4 | workflow generated by API Evangelist |
Generated 2026-10-24 from API Evangelist's own files; nothing on this page is a model's judgement. Provisional and unweighted; not part of the Kin Score composite or agent readiness. Read the Market layer methodology. Disagree with an edge? Every edge cites its evidence and can be corrected through the normal correction path.