SaaS Security
Providers using this tag (25)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 7 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 4 Limited public surface area
Emerging 7 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 5 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (9)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 3 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 1 Limited public surface area
Emerging 3 Early or largely undocumented
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 23 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged SaaS Security, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 37.4 | 26.5 | +10.9 | 23 |
| Operational Transparency | 21.1 | 13.7 | +7.4 | 23 |
| Contract Governance | 11.9 | 6.3 | +5.6 | 23 |
| Contract Quality | 21.5 | 17.6 | +3.9 | 23 |
| Discoverability | 61.9 | 58.1 | +3.8 | 23 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 26.5 | 23.2 | +3.3 | 23 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 17% | 14% | +3 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 17% | 12% | +5 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 13% | 11% | +2 |
| Security | 96% | 98% | -2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 25% | 14% | +11 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 AppOmni 59
- 2 DoControl 52.5
- 3 Riot 52.3
- 4 Axonius 51.4
- 5 Augmentt 45.7
- 6 Push Security 45.6
- 7 Spin.AI 44
- 8 SaaS Alerts 41.2
- 9 Nudge Security 38.7
- 10 SkyKick 33.8
- 1 AppOmni 36.7
- 2 Riot 36.5
- 3 DoControl 33.8
- 4 Augmentt 31
- 5 Axonius 25.8
- 6 Spin.AI 25.5
- 7 Push Security 19.8
- 8 SaaS Alerts 19.8
- 9 Nudge Security 19.8
- 10 Saasment 19.8
Coverage caveat. 19 of 23 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.