OIDC
OIDCOidcoidc
Providers using this tag (43)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 6 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 18 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 13 Limited public surface area
Emerging 4 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (31)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 12 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 10 Limited public surface area
Emerging 5 Early or largely undocumented
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 43 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged OIDC, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 53 | 17.5 | +35.5 | 43 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 43.1 | 17.9 | +25.2 | 43 |
| Operational Transparency | 30 | 11.3 | +18.7 | 43 |
| Access Clarity | 37 | 22.3 | +14.7 | 43 |
| Contract Governance | 17.9 | 6.4 | +11.5 | 43 |
| Discoverability | 71.6 | 60.4 | +11.2 | 43 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 33% | 16% | +17 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 9% | 7% | +2 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 30% | 9% | +21 |
| Security | 100% | 88% | +12 |
| Arazzo workflows | 12% | 2% | +10 |
| Governance rules | 49% | 13% | +36 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Canva 69
- 2 Cisco Identity Services Engine 67.8
- 3 GitHub 62.4
- 4 GitHub Actions 62.1
- 5 Green Button Alliance 61.5
- 6 Amazon Cognito 59.3
- 7 Beyond Identity 56.3
- 8 Login.gov 56
- 9 Auth0 53.4
- 10 WorkOS 53.4
- 1 Canva 49.1
- 2 GitHub 45.5
- 3 Virgin Money UK 41.5
- 4 Dream Sports 41
- 5 GitHub Actions 40.2
- 6 Green Button Alliance 39.9
- 7 WorkOS 38.3
- 8 APIs.io Engineering Platform 37.8
- 9 Cisco Identity Services Engine 36.2
- 10 Auth0 34.7
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/oidc"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/oidc"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/oidc/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.