Italy
Providers using this tag (52)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Thin 5 Limited public surface area
Emerging 10 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 32 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (1)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 50 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Italy, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discoverability | 60.2 | 57.9 | +2.3 | 50 |
| Contract Governance | 7.4 | 6.5 | +0.9 | 50 |
| Operational Transparency | 9 | 13 | -4 | 50 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 16.6 | 23.2 | -6.6 | 50 |
| Contract Quality | 9.7 | 17.2 | -7.5 | 50 |
| Access Clarity | 13 | 23.9 | -10.9 | 50 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 4% | 13% | -9 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 4% | 12% | -8 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 6% | 11% | -5 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 12% | 16% | -4 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 PagoPA 69
- 2 Bancomat 58
- 3 Plumma 53.4
- 4 Satispay 48.3
- 5 Sibill 46.9
- 6 Politecnico di Torino 37.9
- 7 WRONG BEAUTY 000 / THE SWARM 35.4
- 8 Politecnico di Milano 27.8
- 9 Terna 27.5
- 10 AgID (Agenzia per l'Italia Digitale) 27.4
- 1 PagoPA 49.6
- 2 Bancomat 42.3
- 3 WRONG BEAUTY 000 / THE SWARM 40.5
- 4 Satispay 40.2
- 5 Sibill 36.9
- 6 Plumma 34.4
- 7 Politecnico di Torino 28.4
- 8 Politecnico di Milano 26.3
- 9 Terna 22.2
- 10 AgID (Agenzia per l'Italia Digitale) 16.2
Coverage caveat. 45 of 50 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 24 October 2026, across 31984 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.