niche · 0.8 market domain

Auctions

Score 17.6 / 100 44 providers +17 via APIs 29 APIs Search apis.io →
Business capabilities this tag reaches
Data & Reference Information Services 2
Variants seen in the corpus: AuctionAuctions

Providers using this tag (44)

Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.

Developing 5 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 6 Limited public surface area
Emerging 19 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 13 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored

APIs with this tag (29)

Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →

Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 7 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 11 Limited public surface area
Emerging 9 Early or largely undocumented

Companies reaching this through an API (17)

These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Auctions” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.

Aura Historia Avito birkinbagstock-com Blizzard Entertainment Bullish CoStar Group CoW Swap Department of the Treasury Deutsche Börse Domain Group FCC (Federal Communications Commission) Flashbots Manifold MISO Nord Pool Opyn Rocket Pool

Score breakdown

Frequency
49.0
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
0.6
spread across providers
Quality lift
23.4
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
3.4
strength of nearest seed neighbor

Related tags

Collectibles 12 co-occurrences Bidding 5 co-occurrences Art 6 co-occurrences Listings 8 co-occurrences Ethereum 8 co-occurrences Smart Contracts 6 co-occurrences Marketplace 34 co-occurrences Profiles 5 co-occurrences

Where this tag comes from

Provider tag44
Api tag29
Openapi tag9
Openapi op tag18

Cohort brief

Auto-generated

The 39 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Auctions, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.

Providers
39
of 44 in the catalog
Mean Kin Score
19.7
-3.1 vs catalog 22.8
Mean Agent Readiness
10.9
-2.4 vs catalog 13.3
Spread
3.1–53.2
median 15.1 · σ 13
How the 39 split by band
Exemplar 0Strong 0Developing 4Thin 6Emerging 18Minimal 11
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
FacetThis cohortCatalogDifferenceScored
Discoverability 58.9 57.9 +1 39
Contract Governance 7.3 9.4 -2.1 39
Access Clarity 22.6 25 -2.4 39
Operational Transparency 9.8 12.4 -2.6 39
Developer Ergonomics 18.9 22.1 -3.2 39
Contract Quality 13 18.2 -5.2 39

A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.

What this cohort publishes
ArtifactThis cohortCatalogDifference
MCP server (any) 10% 16% -6
MCP server (first-party) 10% 14% -4
Agent Skills 0% 0% 0
OAuth scopes 13% 13% 0
Security 98% 98% 0
Arazzo workflows 3% 2% +1
Governance rules 28% 35% -7

mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.

Top by Kin Score
  1. 1 Cox Automotive 53.2
  2. 2 eBay 50.7
  3. 3 nowyourlink-com 45.9
  4. 4 BidProwl 45.1
  5. 5 SNHP 42.5
  6. 6 Ariba Sourcing 34.9
  7. 7 CREXi 34.8
  8. 8 SuperRare 33.5
  9. 9 Tradera 33.1
  10. 10 Artsy 28.4
Top by Agent Readiness
  1. 1 nowyourlink-com 70.9
  2. 2 SNHP 43.1
  3. 3 BidProwl 36.7
  4. 4 Cox Automotive 34.5
  5. 5 Ariba Sourcing 33
  6. 6 eBay 32
  7. 7 Whisky Hunter 31.2
  8. 8 Connells Group 31.1
  9. 9 SuperRare 29.6
  10. 10 Artsy 27.6
All 44 members of this roster resolve to a provider in the catalog; 39 carry a score (89%). The figures above describe the scored members only.
Coverage caveat. 34 of 39 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 7 November 2026, across 38912 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.

Work with this as data

Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.

MCP server

One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.

https://apis.io/mcp

Tools for tags

7 MCP tools reach this
  • find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.
  • get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.
  • cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.
  • cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.
  • apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.
  • resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.
  • find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
All 92 tools →

Call it yourself

curl for this page
This tag
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/auctions"
All tags
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
As a scored cohort (paid plan)
The distribution (Pro)

Calls without X-API-Key need no key. Calls with it need a paid plan — get a key.

Get an API key

Free tier, no form to fill in. Signing in shares your email address with us — we store it to create your key and to recognise you if you sign in with another provider. See our Privacy Policy and Terms.

A second provider on the same verified email joins the account you already have.