API Discovery
API Discoveryapi-discovery
Providers using this tag (25)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 2 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 5 Limited public surface area
Emerging 12 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (15)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Thin 1 Limited public surface area
Emerging 10 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 25 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged API Discovery, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operational Transparency | 23.8 | 11.3 | +12.5 | 25 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 29 | 17.9 | +11.1 | 25 |
| Discoverability | 69.5 | 60.4 | +9.1 | 25 |
| Contract Quality | 26 | 17.5 | +8.5 | 25 |
| Access Clarity | 30.4 | 22.3 | +8.1 | 25 |
| Contract Governance | 14.3 | 6.4 | +7.9 | 25 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 28% | 16% | +12 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 20% | 7% | +13 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 8% | 9% | -1 |
| Security | 96% | 88% | +8 |
| Arazzo workflows | 12% | 2% | +10 |
| Governance rules | 44% | 13% | +31 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 APIs.io 76.1
- 2 API Evangelist 69.8
- 3 Fastly 60.8
- 4 Microsoft Azure API Management 58
- 5 Merit Systems 53.3
- 6 Orthogonal 52
- 7 Akamai API Security 37
- 8 Cequence Security 36.3
- 9 Traceable 33.8
- 10 APIs.guru 31.3
- 1 Orthogonal 49.9
- 2 APIs.io 47.5
- 3 API Evangelist 44.8
- 4 Traceable 29
- 5 Merit Systems 27.2
- 6 APIs.guru 25.8
- 7 Microsoft Azure API Management 25.8
- 8 Akamai API Security 24.8
- 9 Fastly 23.4
- 10 Public APIs 20
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/api-discovery"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/api-discovery"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/api-discovery/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.