API Testing
Providers using this tag (52)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Developing 13 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 14 Limited public surface area
Emerging 17 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 3 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (40)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 10 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 9 Limited public surface area
Emerging 14 Early or largely undocumented
Unrated 5 Not yet scored
Companies reaching this through an API (9)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “API Testing” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 48 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged API Testing, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 33.9 | 23.4 | +10.5 | 48 |
| Contract Quality | 29.3 | 20.1 | +9.2 | 48 |
| Operational Transparency | 22.9 | 14 | +8.9 | 48 |
| Contract Governance | 13.5 | 6.5 | +7 | 48 |
| Access Clarity | 32.3 | 26.5 | +5.8 | 48 |
| Discoverability | 64.6 | 61 | +3.6 | 48 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 24% | 10% | +14 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 16% | 13% | +3 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 6% | 11% | -5 |
| Security | 98% | 96% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 6% | 2% | +4 |
| Governance rules | 45% | 13% | +32 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Postman 72.4
- 2 Routebase 62.1
- 3 Keploy 57
- 4 Apidog 52.5
- 5 Pynt 51.2
- 6 Bruno 49.9
- 7 Elva 49.5
- 8 Assertible 48.5
- 9 Testmail 44.6
- 10 APIToolkit (Monoscope) 44.5
- 1 Postman 57.6
- 2 Routebase 52.9
- 3 Elva 44.8
- 4 Assertible 34.7
- 5 Keploy 34.6
- 6 Archal 31
- 7 Testmail 30.6
- 8 Agent Diff 30.6
- 9 Ressl 29.9
- 10 Traceable 29
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.