Markets · bedrock market · provisional
MLOps and AI/ML Infrastructure (LF AI & Data, MLPerf, Kubeflow)
Standards market (lf ai & data landscape + membership, mlperf benchmark results, kubeflow distributions). The Kin Score Market layer reads each provider in its market:
who it integrates with, how deep those integrations go, and where the market publishes its own structure.
Methodology.
67providers measured
30 (44.8%)declare their own
21 (31.3%)covered by others only
6 (9.0%)distribution only (sell through, not integrations)
10 (14.9%)undeclared
26declare compatibility (report only, not weighted)
0in-market workflows shown
Provisional. Provisional and unweighted: the Market layer is not part of the composite or agent readiness. Leader lists are read within a position, never as one ranking. A provider that declares nothing we can
read is shown as undeclared, with no number: we never infer integrations.
Where this market publishes its structure
- LF AI & Data Landscape (lfai/landscape landscape.yml @95d361b8ab) machine-readable, 473 entries, 67 members, 40 hosting companies, 62 LF AI & Data projects; 69 providers linked
- MLCommons MLPerf results (mlcommons/*_results_v* repos: closed/ + open/ submitter directories) machine-readable, 54 round repos, 9 families (inference v6.1, training v6.0, storage v3.0, hpc v3.0, mobile, tiny, automotive, endpoints); 183 directories -> 118 organisations; 31 providers linked via Wikidata P856
- Kubeflow packaged distributions (kubeflow/website installing-kubeflow table @5a17330435) machine-readable, 6 rows; 1 linked (Red Hat); Canonical (ubuntu.com), prokube, QBO have no catalog holder; Azure/Nutanix link to github.io
- MLPerf AlgoPerf (algorithms_results) not machine-readable: anonymised team numbers, not organisations
- MLCommons members (mlcommons.org/our-members) not machine-readable: logo grid of images; no names or links in the HTML
- Hugging Face verified organisations not machine-readable: no public list; /api/organizations HTTP 401
- Ray ecosystem / integrations (docs.ray.io) not machine-readable: docs prose page, a mention list not a register
Own = declares at least one integration itself; covered = visible only because an aggregator, standards body, regulator or partner contract names it; distribution-only = listed only on cloud marketplaces it sells through, a channel reported beside, never counted as its own declared integrations; undeclared = nothing we can read, so no number; declares_compatibility = providers with a `compatible` shape vote, report only (kin, 2026-10-13): never counted as own, never in depth or position.
Taxonomy how this market maps onto apis.io
Derived 2026-10-23 from the 67 providers in this market we could resolve in the
catalog. The percentage is the share of those providers carrying each one; it describes the market, not the tag or industry. Tag groups have no page of their own yet, so they are listed unlinked.
share of resolved cohort carrying it; tags >=0.20 & >=3 members (max 12, junk dropped), tag_groups >=0.20 (cooccurrence, non-cross-cutting; max 8), industries >=0.20 (max 6), areas >=0.10 (max 6; areas are keyword-matched and sparse), capabilities L1 >=0.20 (max 8); derive-market-taxonomy.py
Leaders by position (provisional)
Provisional: grouped by position, depth compared within a position only. Distribution (cloud marketplaces) and iPaaS bridges are counted beside
position, never inside it. Unknown-builder listings are left out of position shares and counted here.
builds-on 15 · publishes apps on other platforms' stores
| Provider | Depth | Integrations | In / out | Unknown builder | Distribution | iPaaS bridge | Mix |
|---|
| JFrog |
52.7 |
20 |
0 / 20 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
standard 30%, builds-on-platform 65%, distribution 5% |
| ZenML |
51.7 |
6 |
0 / 6 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
standard 33%, builds-on-platform 67% |
| Modal |
43.1 |
8 |
0 / 8 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
covered 25%, builds-on-platform 38%, distribution 38% |
| TrueFoundry |
42.8 |
7 |
0 / 7 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
ipaas-bridge 14%, standard 14%, builds-on-platform 57%, distribution 14% |
| DataRobot |
42.7 |
7 |
0 / 7 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
contract 14%, builds-on-platform 43%, distribution 43% |
| Astronomer |
42.5 |
10 |
0 / 10 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
builds-on-platform 60%, distribution 40% |
| Paperspace |
42.5 |
5 |
0 / 5 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
covered 20%, builds-on-platform 60%, distribution 20% |
| Dataiku |
36.7 |
6 |
0 / 6 |
0 |
4 |
1 |
ipaas-bridge 12%, standard 12%, builds-on-platform 25%, distribution 50% |
| Chalk |
32.6 |
6 |
0 / 6 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
builds-on-platform 17%, distribution 83% |
| Roboflow |
29.2 |
7 |
0 / 7 |
0 |
4 |
2 |
ipaas-bridge 25%, builds-on-platform 25%, distribution 50% |
| Superb AI |
26.8 thin |
2 |
0 / 2 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
builds-on-platform 33%, distribution 67% |
| ClearML |
17.2 thin |
1 |
0 / 1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
builds-on-platform 100% |
| fiddler.ai |
17.2 thin |
1 |
0 / 1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
builds-on-platform 100% |
| Neptune.ai |
17.2 thin |
1 |
0 / 1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
builds-on-platform 100% |
| The San Francisco Compute Company |
17.2 thin |
1 |
0 / 1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
builds-on-platform 100% |
covered 2 · reached mainly through aggregators
| Provider | Depth | Integrations | In / out | Unknown builder | Distribution | iPaaS bridge | Mix |
|---|
| Lambda |
51.7 |
4 |
0 / 4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
standard 25%, covered 50%, builds-on-platform 25% |
| Segmind |
36.4 |
3 |
0 / 3 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
covered 33%, distribution 67% |
regulated 1 · named in a regulator's register or partners' contracts
| Provider | Depth | Integrations | In / out | Unknown builder | Distribution | iPaaS bridge | Mix |
|---|
| Credo AI |
40.5 |
5 |
0 / 5 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
contract 20%, standard 20%, distribution 60% |
standard 30 · listed by a voluntary standard's own directory
| Provider | Depth | Integrations | In / out | Unknown builder | Distribution | iPaaS bridge | Mix |
|---|
| Hewlett Packard Enterprise |
62.8 |
25 |
0 / 25 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
standard 56%, builds-on-platform 30%, distribution 15% |
| Lenovo |
61.2 |
14 |
0 / 14 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
standard 86%, builds-on-platform 7%, distribution 7% |
| Intel |
58.5 |
19 |
0 / 19 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
contract 5%, standard 68%, builds-on-platform 21%, distribution 5% |
| Super Micro Computer |
58.3 |
6 |
0 / 6 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
standard 100% |
| PyTorch |
58.1 |
3 |
0 / 3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
standard 100% |
| Advanced Micro Devices |
58.0 |
23 |
0 / 23 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
standard 70%, builds-on-platform 17%, distribution 13% |
| Qualcomm |
57.5 |
7 |
0 / 7 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
standard 100% |
| Rebellions |
54.9 |
3 |
0 / 3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
standard 100% |
| Dell Technologies |
54.8 |
10 |
0 / 10 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
standard 70%, builds-on-platform 30% |
| Seldon |
54.1 |
4 |
0 / 4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
standard 100% |
| CoreWeave |
53.3 |
9 |
0 / 9 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
standard 67%, covered 11%, builds-on-platform 22% |
| MLflow |
52.4 |
3 |
0 / 3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
standard 100% |
| Labelbox |
51.8 |
5 |
0 / 5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
standard 60%, covered 20%, builds-on-platform 20% |
| TensorFlow |
50.8 |
4 |
0 / 4 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
standard 75%, distribution 25% |
| Alluxio |
47.9 |
5 |
0 / 5 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
standard 80%, distribution 20% |
| H2O.ai |
43.3 |
7 |
0 / 7 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
standard 29%, builds-on-platform 29%, distribution 43% |
| Flyte |
40.9 thin |
2 |
0 / 2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
standard 100% |
| Kubeflow |
40.9 thin |
2 |
0 / 2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
standard 100% |
| FuriosaAI |
40.2 |
4 |
0 / 4 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
standard 25%, builds-on-platform 25%, distribution 50% |
| Tecton |
40.2 |
4 |
0 / 4 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
standard 50%, distribution 50% |
| ArthurAI |
36.4 |
3 |
0 / 3 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
standard 33%, distribution 67% |
| Determined AI |
34.5 thin |
2 |
0 / 2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
standard 50%, builds-on-platform 50% |
| Habana Labs |
34.5 thin |
2 |
0 / 2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
standard 100% |
| Label Studio |
34.5 thin |
2 |
0 / 2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
standard 50%, builds-on-platform 50% |
| WhyLabs |
33.2 thin |
2 |
0 / 2 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
standard 50%, distribution 50% |
| KServe |
23.6 thin |
1 |
0 / 1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
standard 100% |
| Ray |
23.6 thin |
1 |
0 / 1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
standard 100% |
| Arize AI |
17.2 thin |
1 |
0 / 1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
standard 100% |
| DVC |
17.2 thin |
1 |
0 / 1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
standard 100% |
| Mithril |
17.2 thin |
1 |
0 / 1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
standard 100% |
mixed 3 · no single mode dominates
| Provider | Depth | Integrations | In / out | Unknown builder | Distribution | iPaaS bridge | Mix |
|---|
| Weights and Biases |
51.7 |
3 |
0 / 3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
standard 33%, covered 33%, builds-on-platform 33% |
| SAKURA internet |
51.3 |
8 |
0 / 8 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
contract 25%, standard 25%, builds-on-platform 25%, distribution 25% |
| Crusoe |
49.8 |
10 |
0 / 10 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
standard 40%, covered 20%, builds-on-platform 30%, distribution 10% |
distribution 6 · only sells through cloud marketplaces
| Provider | Depth | Integrations | In / out | Unknown builder | Distribution | iPaaS bridge | Mix |
|---|
| Edge Impulse |
28.8 |
3 |
0 / 3 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
distribution 100% |
| Comet |
19.2 thin |
2 |
0 / 2 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
distribution 100% |
| Compresr |
19.2 thin |
2 |
0 / 2 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
distribution 100% |
| DataLoop |
19.2 thin |
2 |
0 / 2 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
distribution 100% |
| NexGen Cloud |
19.2 thin |
2 |
0 / 2 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
distribution 100% |
| Domino Data Lab |
9.6 thin |
1 |
0 / 1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
distribution 100% |
undeclared 10 · declares nothing we can read: no number