niche · -1.0 market domain

VPN

Score 18.1 / 100 33 providers +8 via APIs 18 APIs Search apis.io →
Business capabilities this tag reaches
Information Technology Management 2

Providers using this tag (33)

Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.

Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 5 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 8 Limited public surface area
Emerging 9 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 7 Almost no public developer surface

APIs with this tag (18)

Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →

Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Thin 9 Limited public surface area
Emerging 4 Early or largely undocumented

Companies reaching this through an API (8)

These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “VPN” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.

Azure Networking Services CheckWebsiteNow Microsoft Windows Server NetBox NetBox Labs NTT RouterOS Telenor Sverige

Score breakdown

Frequency
43.7
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
0.4
spread across providers
Quality lift
27.7
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
10.0
strength of nearest seed neighbor

Related tags

WireGuard 6 co-occurrences Antivirus 5 co-occurrences Remote Access 6 co-occurrences Zero Trust 12 co-occurrences Firewall 6 co-occurrences Network Security 6 co-occurrences DNS 7 co-occurrences Networking 16 co-occurrences

Where this tag comes from

Provider tag33
Api tag18
Openapi tag3
Openapi op tag6

Cohort brief

Auto-generated

The 30 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged VPN, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.

Providers
30
of 33 in the catalog
Mean Kin Score
30.1
+6.0 vs catalog 24.1
Mean Agent Readiness
14.2
+0.1 vs catalog 14.1
Spread
2.2–75
median 30.4 · σ 19
How the 30 split by band
Exemplar 2Strong 2Developing 5Thin 8Emerging 9Minimal 4
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
FacetThis cohortCatalogDifferenceScored
Access Clarity 37 30 +7 30
Contract Quality 25.1 18.6 +6.5 30
Operational Transparency 19 13.2 +5.8 30
Developer Ergonomics 29.6 24.5 +5.1 30
Discoverability 63 59.1 +3.9 30
Contract Governance 11.2 9.7 +1.5 30

A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.

What this cohort publishes
ArtifactThis cohortCatalogDifference
MCP server (any) 13% 18% -5
MCP server (first-party) 13% 16% -3
Agent Skills 0% 0% 0
OAuth scopes 3% 13% -10
Security 100% 99% +1
Arazzo workflows 0% 1% -1
Governance rules 53% 36% +17

mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.

Top by Kin Score
  1. 1 Amazon VPN 75
  2. 2 ZeroTier 67.1
  3. 3 Nord Security 65.3
  4. 4 Nym Technologies 55.2
  5. 5 Border0 52.3
  6. 6 ipatlas-dev 42.6
  7. 7 Commerce for Agents 42.4
  8. 8 Tailscale 40.1
  9. 9 DuckDuckGo 39.4
  10. 10 Pulse 37.2
Top by Agent Readiness
  1. 1 Nord Security 42.9
  2. 2 Commerce for Agents 38.2
  3. 3 Amazon VPN 34.5
  4. 4 NetBird 28.4
  5. 5 ZeroTier 26.4
  6. 6 Perimeter 81 24.7
  7. 7 Border0 23.6
  8. 8 Cisco Secure Client 22.4
  9. 9 pfSense 21.8
  10. 10 Tailscale 21.5
All 33 members of this roster resolve to a provider in the catalog; 30 carry a score (91%). The figures above describe the scored members only.
Coverage caveat. 24 of 30 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 14 November 2026, across 41591 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.

Work with this as data

Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.

MCP server

One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.

https://apis.io/mcp

Tools for tags

7 MCP tools reach this
  • find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.
  • get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.
  • cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.
  • cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.
  • apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.
  • resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.
  • find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
All 92 tools →

Call it yourself

curl for this page
This tag
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/vpn"
All tags
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
As a scored cohort (paid plan)
The distribution (Pro)

Calls without X-API-Key need no key. Calls with it need a paid plan — get a key.

Get an API key

Free tier, no form to fill in. Signing in shares your email address with us — we store it to create your key and to recognise you if you sign in with another provider. See our Privacy Policy and Terms.

A second provider on the same verified email joins the account you already have.