niche · 0.3 market industrydomain

Visibility

Score 17.0 / 100 29 providers +14 via APIs 16 APIs Search apis.io →
Business capabilities this tag reaches
Supply Chain Management 1

Providers using this tag (29)

Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.

Developing 4 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 8 Limited public surface area
Emerging 10 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 7 Almost no public developer surface

APIs with this tag (16)

Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →

Developing 6 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 5 Limited public surface area
Emerging 4 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface

Companies reaching this through an API (14)

These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Visibility” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.

AI Demos aimentiontracker-ai BusinessMCP C.H. Robinson E2open ISAAC Instruments letagentsin-com Lokki OneRail Roper Technologies RWTH Aachen University sennder Uber Freight ZeroRank

Score breakdown

Frequency
44.6
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
0.4
spread across providers
Quality lift
27.1
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
2.2
strength of nearest seed neighbor

Related tags

SEO 9 co-occurrences Brands 5 co-occurrences Freight 5 co-occurrences Transportation 9 co-occurrences Supply Chain 12 co-occurrences Logistics 11 co-occurrences Marketing 10 co-occurrences Documents 5 co-occurrences

Where this tag comes from

Provider tag29
Api tag13
Openapi tag9
Openapi op tag26

Cohort brief

Auto-generated

The 27 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Visibility, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.

Providers
27
of 29 in the catalog
Mean Kin Score
23.3
+0.5 vs catalog 22.8
Mean Agent Readiness
19
+5.7 vs catalog 13.3
Spread
3.4–49.1
median 20.7 · σ 13.2
How the 27 split by band
Exemplar 0Strong 0Developing 4Thin 8Emerging 9Minimal 6
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
FacetThis cohortCatalogDifferenceScored
Access Clarity 30.1 25 +5.1 27
Contract Governance 11.4 9.4 +2 27
Contract Quality 19.5 18.2 +1.3 27
Operational Transparency 12.1 12.4 -0.3 27
Discoverability 56.2 57.9 -1.7 27
Developer Ergonomics 17.7 22.1 -4.4 27

A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.

What this cohort publishes
ArtifactThis cohortCatalogDifference
MCP server (any) 19% 16% +3
MCP server (first-party) 19% 14% +5
Agent Skills 0% 0% 0
OAuth scopes 22% 13% +9
Security 100% 98% +2
Arazzo workflows 0% 2% -2
Governance rules 37% 35% +2

mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.

Top by Kin Score
  1. 1 AuditAE 49.1
  2. 2 answerline-dev 46.1
  3. 3 Balladic 44.4
  4. 4 Asked Thrice 39.8
  5. 5 CiteLadder 36.2
  6. 6 Expeditors International of Washington 34.4
  7. 7 Picked by Agents 33.2
  8. 8 CargoSmart 32.4
  9. 9 botsee-io 31
  10. 10 cite42-dev 30.6
Top by Agent Readiness
  1. 1 AuditAE 55.3
  2. 2 Balladic 48.3
  3. 3 answerline-dev 46.3
  4. 4 cite42-dev 43.7
  5. 5 botsee-io 43
  6. 6 CiteLadder 38.1
  7. 7 Asked Thrice 32.9
  8. 8 BrandPresence 30.4
  9. 9 Cituna 29.9
  10. 10 Picked by Agents 22.4
All 29 members of this roster resolve to a provider in the catalog; 27 carry a score (93%). The figures above describe the scored members only.
Coverage caveat. 20 of 27 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 7 November 2026, across 38912 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.

Work with this as data

Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.

MCP server

One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.

https://apis.io/mcp

Tools for tags

7 MCP tools reach this
  • find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.
  • get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.
  • cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.
  • cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.
  • apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.
  • resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.
  • find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
All 92 tools →

Call it yourself

curl for this page
This tag
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/visibility"
All tags
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
As a scored cohort (paid plan)
The distribution (Pro)

Calls without X-API-Key need no key. Calls with it need a paid plan — get a key.

Get an API key

Free tier, no form to fill in. Signing in shares your email address with us — we store it to create your key and to recognise you if you sign in with another provider. See our Privacy Policy and Terms.

A second provider on the same verified email joins the account you already have.