Recipes
Providers using this tag (54)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 11 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 13 Limited public surface area
Emerging 14 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 13 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (52)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 7 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 8 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 18 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 10 Limited public surface area
Emerging 9 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (28)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Recipes” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
54 providers carry this tag directly, and 58 counting the 1 narrower tag below — 4 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 51 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Recipes, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 26.4 | 18.6 | +7.8 | 51 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 27.3 | 24.5 | +2.8 | 51 |
| Discoverability | 61.4 | 59.1 | +2.3 | 51 |
| Contract Governance | 11.9 | 9.7 | +2.2 | 51 |
| Access Clarity | 29.5 | 30 | -0.5 | 51 |
| Operational Transparency | 12.5 | 13.2 | -0.7 | 51 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 20% | 18% | +2 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 20% | 16% | +4 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 14% | 13% | +1 |
| Security | 100% | 99% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 1% | -1 |
| Governance rules | 51% | 36% | +15 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 tinyplates-dev 59.6
- 2 Tandoor Recipes 59.5
- 3 ComingUp Today 55.7
- 4 fatsecret 52.9
- 5 Piknik.Spot 49.5
- 6 Spoonacular 49.5
- 7 Suggestic 49.4
- 8 Recipe API 46.3
- 9 Tastewise 44.6
- 10 Mealie 41.7
- 1 Recipe API 57.8
- 2 Piknik.Spot 56.4
- 3 Apicbase 43.9
- 4 tinyplates-dev 39.5
- 5 ComingUp Today 37.8
- 6 ReceptAPI 34.4
- 7 fatsecret 31.9
- 8 Food Info 29.8
- 9 Mealie 29.7
- 10 botrecipe-com 29.7
Coverage caveat. 39 of 51 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 14 November 2026, across 41591 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.