Platform Engineering
Providers using this tag (36)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 8 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 7 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 14 Limited public surface area
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (7)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 2 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 4 Limited public surface area
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 34 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Platform Engineering, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 39.4 | 18.6 | +20.8 | 34 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 39.4 | 24.5 | +14.9 | 34 |
| Operational Transparency | 26.4 | 13.2 | +13.2 | 34 |
| Discoverability | 67.3 | 59.1 | +8.2 | 34 |
| Contract Governance | 16.8 | 9.7 | +7.1 | 34 |
| Access Clarity | 36.9 | 30 | +6.9 | 34 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 26% | 18% | +8 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 26% | 16% | +10 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 15% | 13% | +2 |
| Security | 100% | 99% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 1% | -1 |
| Governance rules | 71% | 36% | +35 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Akuity 73.7
- 2 Env0 64.8
- 3 Facets 63.9
- 4 Nuon 63.4
- 5 Release 61.8
- 6 Configure8 61.1
- 7 Backstage 60.5
- 8 Dream Sports 57.7
- 9 Choreo 55.7
- 10 Devtron 49.3
- 1 Backstage 57.3
- 2 Facets 42.1
- 3 Cortex 41.8
- 4 Dream Sports 40.5
- 5 Configure8 38.8
- 6 Nuon 36.2
- 7 Humanitec 36.2
- 8 OpsLevel 35.2
- 9 Cycloid 32.5
- 10 Devtron 31.1
Coverage caveat. 25 of 34 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 14 November 2026, across 41591 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.