Platform Engineering
Providers using this tag (33)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 6 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 8 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 9 Limited public surface area
Emerging 7 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (7)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 2 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 3 Limited public surface area
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 33 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Platform Engineering, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 35.8 | 17.2 | +18.6 | 33 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 37.9 | 23.2 | +14.7 | 33 |
| Operational Transparency | 27.6 | 13 | +14.6 | 33 |
| Discoverability | 66.7 | 57.9 | +8.8 | 33 |
| Access Clarity | 30.8 | 23.9 | +6.9 | 33 |
| Contract Governance | 10.7 | 6.5 | +4.2 | 33 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 24% | 13% | +11 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 24% | 12% | +12 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 12% | 11% | +1 |
| Security | 97% | 98% | -1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 30% | 16% | +14 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Akuity 73
- 2 Env0 63.1
- 3 Backstage 61.6
- 4 Facets 60.5
- 5 Amazon Proton 56.5
- 6 Configure8 56.2
- 7 Nuon 55.9
- 8 Release 52.6
- 9 Dream Sports 50.3
- 10 Choreo 50.2
- 1 Backstage 57.3
- 2 Dream Sports 39.8
- 3 Facets 39.4
- 4 Configure8 38.8
- 5 Nuon 36.2
- 6 Humanitec 36.2
- 7 OpsLevel 35.2
- 8 Allianz Future Cloud Platform 33
- 9 Devtron 31.1
- 10 Env0 30.3
Coverage caveat. 24 of 33 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 24 October 2026, across 31984 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.