Managed Service
Managed ServiceManaged Servicesmanaged-services
Providers using this tag (37)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 4 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 8 Limited public surface area
Emerging 10 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 12 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 2 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (11)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 4 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 3 Limited public surface area
Emerging 3 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (10)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Managed Service” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 32 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Managed Service, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Governance | 6.7 | 6.3 | +0.4 | 32 |
| Access Clarity | 25.9 | 26.3 | -0.4 | 32 |
| Contract Quality | 18.6 | 19.8 | -1.2 | 32 |
| Discoverability | 59.5 | 61 | -1.5 | 32 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 19.7 | 23.3 | -3.6 | 32 |
| Operational Transparency | 10.2 | 13.9 | -3.7 | 32 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 6% | 10% | -4 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 3% | 9% | -6 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 9% | 11% | -2 |
| Security | 94% | 97% | -3 |
| Arazzo workflows | 3% | 2% | +1 |
| Governance rules | 12% | 14% | -2 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Amazon DynamoDB 58.5
- 2 Platform.sh 52.8
- 3 Amazon App Runner 48.5
- 4 Codesphere 47.9
- 5 Rackspace Technology 39.3
- 6 Aryaka 38.7
- 7 Google Kubernetes Engine 37.1
- 8 Windstream Holdings 34.3
- 9 Google Cloud Datastore 30.6
- 10 Options Technology 30.5
- 1 Platform.sh 49.5
- 2 Amazon DynamoDB 26.6
- 3 Google Kubernetes Engine 26.5
- 4 Google Cloud Datastore 24
- 5 Codesphere 23.6
- 6 Rackspace Technology 22.3
- 7 Amazon App Runner 20.1
- 8 Aryaka 19.8
- 9 Windstream Holdings 19.8
- 10 AWS Backup 19
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.