Indexing
Providers using this tag (34)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 12 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 13 Limited public surface area
Emerging 4 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (21)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 10 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 6 Limited public surface area
Emerging 3 Early or largely undocumented
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 34 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Indexing, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 44.2 | 17.5 | +26.7 | 34 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 35.6 | 17.9 | +17.7 | 34 |
| Operational Transparency | 25.8 | 11.3 | +14.5 | 34 |
| Access Clarity | 31.4 | 22.3 | +9.1 | 34 |
| Discoverability | 69.2 | 60.4 | +8.8 | 34 |
| Contract Governance | 9.5 | 6.4 | +3.1 | 34 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 26% | 16% | +10 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 3% | 7% | -4 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 12% | 9% | +3 |
| Security | 97% | 88% | +9 |
| Arazzo workflows | 3% | 2% | +1 |
| Governance rules | 38% | 13% | +25 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Google Search Console 67.1
- 2 Google Indexing 65.1
- 3 Microsoft Copilot 51.5
- 4 Amazon IoT Device Defender 49.7
- 5 Amazon IoT Core 49
- 6 Amazon IoT Device Management 48.2
- 7 Sentio 47.7
- 8 Google Workspace 47.5
- 9 Lido Finance 46.8
- 10 Perforce 45.6
- 1 Google Search Console 38.7
- 2 Alchemy 31.7
- 3 Perforce 31.2
- 4 Google Indexing 30.8
- 5 Hiro 30.6
- 6 Sentio 30.5
- 7 Lido Finance 30.2
- 8 Microsoft Copilot 29.9
- 9 Amazon IoT Core 29.8
- 10 Amazon IoT Device Defender 29.8
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.