Identity Management
Providers using this tag (26)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 6 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 6 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 4 Limited public surface area
Emerging 5 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (20)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 4 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 8 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 5 Limited public surface area
Emerging 2 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (17)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Identity Management” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
26 providers carry this tag directly, and 313 counting the 2 narrower tags below — 287 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 24 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Identity Management, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 47.1 | 17.6 | +29.5 | 24 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 46.4 | 23.2 | +23.2 | 24 |
| Access Clarity | 47.1 | 26.5 | +20.6 | 24 |
| Operational Transparency | 30.8 | 13.7 | +17.1 | 24 |
| Contract Governance | 22.8 | 6.3 | +16.5 | 24 |
| Discoverability | 63.8 | 58.1 | +5.7 | 24 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 20% | 14% | +6 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 12% | 12% | 0 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 20% | 11% | +9 |
| Security | 92% | 98% | -6 |
| Arazzo workflows | 20% | 2% | +18 |
| Governance rules | 76% | 14% | +62 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Kinde 87.5
- 2 Clerk 71.4
- 3 Auth0 70
- 4 Databricks 65.3
- 5 Frontegg 65
- 6 Microsoft Active Directory 61.4
- 7 ForgeRock 56.7
- 8 SailPoint 56.1
- 9 Yoodli 55.1
- 10 Amazon IAM Identity Center 54.2
- 1 Databricks 51.5
- 2 Kinde 48.1
- 3 Clerk 45.9
- 4 Auth0 37.2
- 5 Yoodli 34
- 6 SailPoint 32.4
- 7 ForgeRock 28.1
- 8 RSA 28.1
- 9 Cirrus Identity 27.7
- 10 Workday Security 27.7
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.