Facilities Management
Providers using this tag (30)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 5 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 8 Limited public surface area
Emerging 9 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 7 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (4)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Thin 1 Limited public surface area
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 29 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Facilities Management, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 32.1 | 26.5 | +5.6 | 29 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 28.3 | 23.2 | +5.1 | 29 |
| Discoverability | 61.3 | 58.1 | +3.2 | 29 |
| Contract Governance | 8.5 | 6.3 | +2.2 | 29 |
| Operational Transparency | 15.6 | 13.7 | +1.9 | 29 |
| Contract Quality | 12.3 | 17.6 | -5.3 | 29 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 17% | 14% | +3 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 17% | 12% | +5 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 21% | 11% | +10 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 7% | 14% | -7 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Accruent 56
- 2 VergeSense 51.7
- 3 ServiceChannel 47.2
- 4 Aramark 46.5
- 5 SMS Assist 44.8
- 6 75F 39.9
- 7 Findable 36.8
- 8 SpaceIQ 35.5
- 9 Clockworks Analytics 35.1
- 10 CBRE 33.3
- 1 VergeSense 53.8
- 2 ServiceChannel 36.9
- 3 Hello Therma 32.7
- 4 Findable 30.2
- 5 Garten 27.3
- 6 Aramark 23.9
- 7 Accruent 23.6
- 8 SMS Assist 23.6
- 9 CBRE 22.9
- 10 Steelcase 19
Coverage caveat. 26 of 29 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.