Data Loss Prevention
Providers using this tag (32)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 4 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 7 Limited public surface area
Emerging 13 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 6 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (3)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 3 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 32 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Data Loss Prevention, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 26.7 | 17.9 | +8.8 | 32 |
| Access Clarity | 29.4 | 22.3 | +7.1 | 32 |
| Discoverability | 62.3 | 60.4 | +1.9 | 32 |
| Contract Governance | 8.3 | 6.4 | +1.9 | 32 |
| Operational Transparency | 10.4 | 11.3 | -0.9 | 32 |
| Contract Quality | 15.6 | 17.5 | -1.9 | 32 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 19% | 16% | +3 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 6% | 7% | -1 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 6% | 9% | -3 |
| Security | 91% | 88% | +3 |
| Arazzo workflows | 3% | 2% | +1 |
| Governance rules | 16% | 13% | +3 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Lakera 57.2
- 2 Microsoft Purview 57.1
- 3 dope.security 54.7
- 4 Trellix Web Gateway 46
- 5 Trellix 43.5
- 6 Symantec 42
- 7 Skyhigh Security 37.1
- 8 Tessian 34.4
- 9 EchoMark 32
- 10 Repacket 31.4
- 1 Microsoft Purview 31.8
- 2 dope.security 29.5
- 3 Tessian 26.1
- 4 Lakera 25.8
- 5 Symantec 22.3
- 6 Trellix Web Gateway 21.5
- 7 Skyhigh Security 21
- 8 Trellix 19.8
- 9 Repacket 12.9
- 10 CloudLock 5.4
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.