Asynchronous
Asynchronousasynchronous
Providers using this tag (25)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 4 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 5 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Emerging 5 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 3 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (19)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 4 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 4 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 5 Limited public surface area
Emerging 4 Early or largely undocumented
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 25 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Asynchronous, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 39.2 | 17.5 | +21.7 | 25 |
| Access Clarity | 39.7 | 22.3 | +17.4 | 25 |
| Operational Transparency | 27.4 | 11.3 | +16.1 | 25 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 33.9 | 17.9 | +16 | 25 |
| Contract Governance | 14.5 | 6.4 | +8.1 | 25 |
| Discoverability | 68.4 | 60.4 | +8 | 25 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 20% | 16% | +4 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 12% | 7% | +5 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 12% | 9% | +3 |
| Security | 88% | 88% | 0 |
| Arazzo workflows | 16% | 2% | +14 |
| Governance rules | 40% | 13% | +27 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Dun & Bradstreet 67.9
- 2 AppsFlyer 66.9
- 3 Flutterwave 63.9
- 4 Zenserp 60.5
- 5 Perplexity 56.3
- 6 Claude 54.4
- 7 DealHub 49.8
- 8 SAP Integration Suite 46.8
- 9 CrossEngage 46.7
- 10 Gemini 46
- 1 AppsFlyer 49.7
- 2 DealHub 46.9
- 3 Dun & Bradstreet 43.2
- 4 Zenserp 33.3
- 5 CrossEngage 31.1
- 6 Perplexity 29.1
- 7 Claude 27.5
- 8 Flutterwave 27.3
- 9 RCSB PDB 25.5
- 10 Ariba 23.6
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/asynchronous"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/asynchronous"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/asynchronous/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.