Agentic
Providers using this tag (25)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Thin 6 Limited public surface area
Minimal 5 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (6)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 2 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 1 Limited public surface area
Emerging 2 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 25 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Agentic, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 42 | 17.9 | +24.1 | 25 |
| Discoverability | 70.4 | 60.4 | +10 | 25 |
| Access Clarity | 31.2 | 22.3 | +8.9 | 25 |
| Operational Transparency | 18 | 11.3 | +6.7 | 25 |
| Contract Quality | 23 | 17.5 | +5.5 | 25 |
| Contract Governance | 9 | 6.4 | +2.6 | 25 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 56% | 16% | +40 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 40% | 7% | +33 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 36% | 9% | +27 |
| Security | 100% | 88% | +12 |
| Arazzo workflows | 8% | 2% | +6 |
| Governance rules | 12% | 13% | -1 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.