Broker vs Advisor

Broker vs Advisor provides guidance on whether a business should use a broker or an M&A advisor to sell a business, explaining thresholds, asset vs stock sales, and regulatory considerations. The site offers FAQs, detailed comparisons, and contact information for professional advice, helping owners navigate the sale process and understand legal and financial implications.

Broker vs Advisor publishes 3 API contracts indexed on the APIs.io network: Enquiry API, Guide API, and MCP API. Tagged areas include Business, Finance, Legal, Advisory, and M&A.

The Broker vs Advisor catalog on APIs.io includes 1 Spectral governance ruleset.

Broker vs Advisor’s developer surface includes authentication and 20 more developer resources.

🌐 Visit website 📡 Profile data on GitHub

28.6/100 thin Agent 27/100 agent aware Full breakdown ↓
scored 2026-11-06 · rubric v0.27.0 · Show this score on your site →

1 published contract 1 MCP Servers 1 Agent Skills

Business Finance Legal Advisory M&A

Kin Score

Kin Score How this is scored →
scored 2026-11-06 · rubric v0.27.0

Composite quality — 28.6/100 · thin

Contract Quality 10.4 / 21

Developer Ergonomics 2.3 / 17

Access Clarity 1.8 / 17

Operational Transparency 0.6 / 11

Contract Governance 2.2 / 10

Discoverability 5.5 / 9

Regulatory Posture 4.0 / 15

Agent readiness — 27/100 · agent aware

Machine-Readable Contract 18 / 18

Agentic Access Contract 10 / 10

Documented Reversibility 0 / 6

MCP Server 12 / 12

Machine-Readable Auth 10 / 10

Idempotency 0 / 9

Stable Error Semantics 8 / 8

Request/Response Examples 0 / 7

Rate-Limit Signaling 0 / 7

Typed Event Surface 0 / 6

Agent Skills 5 / 5

Well-Known Catalog 4 / 4

Consent & Bot Identity 0 / 3

A2A Agent Card 0 / 8

Dry-Run / Simulate Mode 0 / 4

Delegated User Identity 0 / 6

Protected Resource Metadata 0 / 5

Registration Without a Human 0 / 6

Agentic Commerce Well-Known Document 0 / 5

Pagination 5 / 5

Distinct Operations 3 / 3

MCP Tool Quality 6 / 6

Regulatory Posture applies to this provider. Its tags matched the Horizontal (data, software, accessibility, platform) regime, so Regulatory Posture carries 15 points of the composite. If this regime is wrong for your business, say so on your provider repo — the applicability map is public and we will correct it.

Create-or-Update Ergonomics could not be measured. We hold no machine-readable contract for this provider to read, so there is nothing to measure a write surface against. Excluded rather than scored zero: never-measured and measured-empty are different facts. Publishing an OpenAPI is what makes this facet — and several others — scorable at all.

The six quality facets above are damped to 85 points between them, because the conditional facet above carries the other 15. That is why each facet's contribution is shown against a damped maximum: raising a quality facet moves the composite by 85% of its nominal weight, not 100%. The full arithmetic is at apis.io/rating/.

Show this score on your site.

It updates itself when the score changes. Paste this where you link to your API docs:

<a href="https://apis.io/providers/brokervsadvisor-com/"><img src="https://apis.io/badge/brokervsadvisor-com/card.svg" alt="Broker vs Advisor on APIs.io — Kin Score by API Evangelist"></a>

Other styles, a README pill and a shields.io endpoint are on the badge page.

Raise your score.

Agent readiness — checks not met, largest first (exact, from this profile):

Idempotency +9 pts — OpenAPI mutating operations declare an idempotency key — a header, a request-body property, or a named de-duplication token whose own description says so (verified); else common[].type matches /idempoten/i (documented)
A2A Agent Card +8 pts — a2a/-a2a.yml manifest, graded on conformance.grade against A2A 1.0.0
Rate-Limit Signaling +7 pts — OpenAPI responses document X-RateLimit-* / RateLimit headers (verified), else a rate_limits artifact or RateLimits link (documented)
Request/Response Examples +7 pts — share of operations carrying request/response examples; else an Examples / Code Samples link
Registration Without a Human +6 pts — a `registration_endpoint` in the served RFC 8414 / OIDC discovery document
Delegated User Identity +6 pts — a served discovery document listing authorization_code in grant_types_supported (served), else an oauth2 authorizationCode flow or openIdConnect declared in an OpenAPI (documented)

6 more unmet checks in the Agent Readiness table above.

Kin Score — facets with the most composite points still available (weight × headroom):

Access Clarity scores 10.5 — up to +17.9 composite points
Developer Ergonomics scores 13.7 — up to +17.3 composite points
Contract Quality scores 48.8 — up to +12.8 composite points

Each check links to what satisfies it. Publish the artifact, or tell us where it already lives, and the score moves on the next scoring run.

Improve this rating by publishing the missing artifacts — every area above can be raised, and the full rubric is at apis.io/rating/. Every facet and dimension name above is a link: it opens that measurement's own page — what it means, the exact checks that feed it, how the whole catalog distributes on it, and the providers at the top of it. This rating is computed from the provider profile at artifacts.apis.io/brokervsadvisor-com/apis.yml: open an issue on github.com/api-evangelist/brokervsadvisor-com to ask a question or point us at an artifact you publish. Submit an artifact on GitHub — free → Manage your own listing — the Influence plan, $499/mo →

Standards implemented 2

Standards this provider implements or carries. De facto ones are profiled and measured by the API Commons; formal ones come from the standards directory and are linked by the provider's own tags. The evidence column says how each claim was established — not that it was made.

Model Context Protocol (MCP)

measured — observed by APIs.io (documented)

OpenAPI

measured — observed by APIs.io (published)

APIs 3

Individual APIs this provider publishes, each with its own machine-readable definition.

Broker vs Advisor Enquiry API

enquiry

Broker vs Advisor Guide API

checker

Broker vs Advisor MCP API

The mcp API from Broker vs Advisor — 1 operation(s) for mcp.

MCP Servers 1

Model Context Protocol servers that expose these APIs to AI agents.

Broker vs Advisor MCP Server

Remote MCP server at brokervsadvisor.com.

MCP SERVER

Agent Skills 1

Packaged agent skills for driving this provider's APIs from an AI assistant.

enquiry

AGENT SKILL

Spectral Rules 1

Spectral governance rulesets for linting and validating these APIs.

Broker vs Advisor API Rules

49 rules · 43 errors 1 warnings 5 info

SPECTRAL

Security Posture 3

Authentication, domain security, vulnerability disclosure, and trust-center signals.

Brokervsadvisor Com Authentication

http · 1 scheme

SECURITY

Brokervsadvisor Com Domain Security

TLSv1.3 · HSTS · DMARC

SECURITY

Brokervsadvisor Com Vulnerability Disclosure

security.txt · contact published

SECURITY

Agentic Access 1

Recommended x-agentic-access execution contracts for AI agents.

Brokervsadvisor Com Agentic Access

8 operations · 7 acting

AGENTIC

Resources

Agent Surfaces 5

MCP servers, agent skills, and machine-readable catalogs

AgenticAccess

AgentSkill

LLMsTxt

MCPServer

WellKnown

Design & Contract 4

Pagination, idempotency, versioning, errors, and events

Spectral

Vocabulary

ErrorCatalog

Conformance

Build 1

SDKs, sample code, and the tooling you integrate with

ToolCrosswalk

ToolCrosswalk

Access & Security 5

Authentication, authorization, and security posture

Security

Security

SecurityTxt

SecurityTxt

Authentication

Authentication

VulnerabilityDisclosure

VulnerabilityDisclosure

DomainSecurity

DomainSecurity

Operate 1

Status, limits, changes, and where to get help

Contact

Contact

Commercial 2

Pricing, plans, and the legal terms of use

TermsOfService

TermsOfService

PrivacyPolicy

PrivacyPolicy

Company 1

The organization behind the API

Website

Website

Other 2

Properties that don't map to a standard resource type

Hosts

Hosts

Vendors

Vendors

Source (apis.yml)

aid: brokervsadvisor-com
name: Broker vs Advisor
accessModel:
  pricing: unknown
  onboarding: unknown
  trial: false
  try_now: false
  public: false
  label: Unknown
  confidence: low
  source:
  - authentication
  - security
  generated: '2026-11-06'
  method: derived
image: https://brokervsadvisor.com/og.png
description: Broker vs Advisor provides guidance on whether a business should use a broker or an M&A advisor to sell a business,
  explaining thresholds, asset vs stock sales, and regulatory considerations. The site offers FAQs, detailed comparisons,
  and contact information for professional advice, helping owners navigate the sale process and understand legal and financial
  implications.
url: https://artifacts.apis.io/brokervsadvisor-com/apis.yml
x-type: company
x-source: harvest:mcp-registry
x-tier: profiled
x-tier-reason: enrichment pass 2026-11-03 (modular-v1; was harvest)
specificationVersion: '0.20'
created: '2026-11-03'
modified: '2026-11-03'
tags:
- Business
- Finance
- Legal
- Advisory
- M&A
maintainers:
- FN: Kin Lane
  email: kin@apievangelist.com
- FN: APIs.json
  email: info@apis.io
common:
- type: AgenticAccess
  url: agentic-access/brokervsadvisor-com-agentic-access.yml
- type: Spectral
  url: rules/brokervsadvisor-com-rules.yml
- type: Vocabulary
  url: vocabulary/brokervsadvisor-com-vocabulary.yml
- type: AgentSkill
  url: skills/_index.yml
- type: Security
  url: https://brokervsadvisor.com/terms
- type: ErrorCatalog
  url: errors/brokervsadvisor-com-problem-types.yml
- type: Conformance
  url: conformance/brokervsadvisor-com-conformance.yml
- type: LLMsTxt
  url: llms/brokervsadvisor-com-llms.txt
- type: ToolCrosswalk
  url: mcp/brokervsadvisor-com-tool-crosswalk.yml
- type: MCPServer
  url: mcp/brokervsadvisor-com-mcp.yml
- type: SecurityTxt
  url: well-known/brokervsadvisor-com-security.txt
- type: WellKnown
  url: well-known/brokervsadvisor-com-well-known.yml
- type: Hosts
  url: hosts/brokervsadvisor-com-hosts.yml
- type: Vendors
  url: vendors/brokervsadvisor-com-vendors.yml
- type: TermsOfService
  url: https://brokervsadvisor.com/terms/
- type: PrivacyPolicy
  url: https://brokervsadvisor.com/privacy/
- type: Authentication
  url: authentication/brokervsadvisor-com-authentication.yml
- type: VulnerabilityDisclosure
  url: security/brokervsadvisor-com-vulnerability-disclosure.yml
- type: DomainSecurity
  url: security/brokervsadvisor-com-domain-security.yml
- type: Website
  url: https://brokervsadvisor.com/
- type: Contact
  url: https://brokervsadvisor.com/contact/
apis:
- aid: brokervsadvisor-com:brokervsadvisor-com-enquiry-api
  name: Broker vs Advisor Enquiry API
  description: enquiry
  humanURL: https://brokervsadvisor.com/
  baseURL: https://brokervsadvisor.com
  tags:
  - enquiry
  properties:
  - type: OpenAPI
    url: openapi/brokervsadvisor-com-enquiry-api-openapi.yml
- aid: brokervsadvisor-com:brokervsadvisor-com-guide-api
  name: Broker vs Advisor Guide API
  description: checker
  humanURL: https://brokervsadvisor.com/
  baseURL: https://brokervsadvisor.com
  tags:
  - guide
  properties:
  - type: OpenAPI
    url: openapi/brokervsadvisor-com-guide-api-openapi.yml
- aid: brokervsadvisor-com:brokervsadvisor-com-mcp-api
  name: Broker vs Advisor MCP API
  description: The mcp API from Broker vs Advisor — 1 operation(s) for mcp.
  humanURL: https://brokervsadvisor.com/
  baseURL: https://brokervsadvisor.com
  tags:
  - MCP
  tags_raw:
  - mcp
  properties:
  - type: OpenAPI
    url: openapi/brokervsadvisor-com-mcp-api-openapi.yml
x-enrichment:
  date: '2026-11-03'
  status: enriched
  artifacts_added: 23
  pass: modular-v1
  engine: identity=local,contract=local,surfaces=local,docs=local,regulatory=local

Broker vs Advisor API — frequently asked questions

Does Broker vs Advisor have an API?

Yes. APIs.io lists 3 APIs from Broker vs Advisor, including Broker vs Advisor Enquiry API, Broker vs Advisor Guide API and Broker vs Advisor MCP API.

Is there an OpenAPI specification for the Broker vs Advisor API?

Yes. APIs.io indexes 3 OpenAPI specifications for Broker vs Advisor, each linked for download from this page.

How do I authenticate with the Broker vs Advisor API?

Broker vs Advisor uses bearer-token authentication (http · 1 scheme). The details are profiled on APIs.io as Brokervsadvisor Com Authentication.

Does Broker vs Advisor have an MCP server?

Yes. APIs.io lists 1 MCP server for Broker vs Advisor: Remote MCP server at brokervsadvisor.com.

Is the Broker vs Advisor API ready for AI agents?

Broker vs Advisor has a Kin Score of 28.6 out of 100 (thin) and an Agent Readiness score of 26.8 (agent-aware), scored by API Evangelist on 2026-11-06.

Work with this as data

Every provider here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.

MCP server

One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.

https://apis.io/mcp

Tools for providers

9 MCP tools reach this

find_providersBrowse and filter every provider in the catalog.
get_provider_artifactsEvery artifact this provider publishes, grouped by type.
get_provider_operationsEvery operation across all of their OpenAPIs — one call instead of parsing every spec.
get_provider_toolsEvery MCP tool they ship, with the operation each wraps.
get_provider_evidenceHow each part of their score was established. Free — the basis for a claim should not sit behind it.
get_provider_ratingPRO — composite, band, trend and facet scores.
apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.
resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.
find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.

All 92 tools →

Call it yourself

curl for this page

This provider

curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/providers/brokervsadvisor-com"

All providers

curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/providers?limit=25"

Every operation they expose

curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/providers/brokervsadvisor-com/operations?limit=25"

How their score was established

curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/providers/brokervsadvisor-com/evidence"

Calls without X-API-Key need no key. Calls with it need a paid plan — get a key.

Get an API key

Free tier, no form to fill in. Signing in shares your email address with us — we store it to create your key and to recognise you if you sign in with another provider. See our Privacy Policy and Terms.

GitHub Google LinkedIn

A second provider on the same verified email joins the account you already have.