Web Development
Providers using this tag (34)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 4 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 4 Limited public surface area
Emerging 12 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 12 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (4)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 1 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (3)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Web Development” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 33 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Web Development, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operational Transparency | 16.3 | 13.7 | +2.6 | 33 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 25.7 | 23.2 | +2.5 | 33 |
| Discoverability | 59 | 58.1 | +0.9 | 33 |
| Contract Governance | 6.9 | 6.3 | +0.6 | 33 |
| Contract Quality | 11.6 | 17.6 | -6 | 33 |
| Access Clarity | 20 | 26.5 | -6.5 | 33 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 18% | 14% | +4 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 18% | 12% | +6 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 9% | 11% | -2 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 9% | 2% | +7 |
| Governance rules | 21% | 14% | +7 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Webflow 60.6
- 2 Webflow API and Documentation 56
- 3 Fiddler 49.7
- 4 Microsoft Edge 44.4
- 5 TypeScript 43.4
- 6 Makeswift 43.2
- 7 TESSA Marketing & Technology 38.4
- 8 Spring Boot 38.1
- 9 HaneruTo 30
- 10 Genie 26.4
- 1 Webflow 61.4
- 2 TESSA Marketing & Technology 47.5
- 3 Webflow API and Documentation 38.4
- 4 Microsoft Edge 30.6
- 5 Makeswift 30.5
- 6 Lovable 28
- 7 Fiddler 20.4
- 8 Meteor 19.4
- 9 HaneruTo 18.9
- 10 Spring Boot 17.3
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.