Static Analysis
Providers using this tag (30)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 5 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 14 Limited public surface area
Emerging 8 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (10)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 3 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 5 Limited public surface area
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 30 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Static Analysis, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 34 | 17.9 | +16.1 | 30 |
| Operational Transparency | 22.5 | 11.3 | +11.2 | 30 |
| Contract Quality | 25.7 | 17.5 | +8.2 | 30 |
| Discoverability | 66.2 | 60.4 | +5.8 | 30 |
| Access Clarity | 27.1 | 22.3 | +4.8 | 30 |
| Contract Governance | 8.9 | 6.4 | +2.5 | 30 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 37% | 16% | +21 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 17% | 7% | +10 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 7% | 9% | -2 |
| Security | 93% | 88% | +5 |
| Arazzo workflows | 3% | 2% | +1 |
| Governance rules | 20% | 13% | +7 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Datadog 57.1
- 2 SonarSource 51.8
- 3 Pixee 49.7
- 4 Trunk 46.8
- 5 Sonar 39.5
- 6 SonarQube 39
- 7 DeepSource 37.8
- 8 Corridor 37.6
- 9 Code Climate 36.5
- 10 Black Duck Software 36.4
- 1 Datadog 38.3
- 2 Trunk 32.1
- 3 SonarSource 30.7
- 4 42Crunch 28.1
- 5 Pixee 25.2
- 6 DeepSource 24.8
- 7 Corridor 23.8
- 8 Sonar 23.2
- 9 Test-Driven Development 21.5
- 10 SonarQube 21.4
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.