Pull Requests
Pull RequestsPullRequestsPullrequests
Providers using this tag (28)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 6 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 13 Limited public surface area
Emerging 3 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (22)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 4 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 6 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 9 Limited public surface area
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 28 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Pull Requests, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 49 | 17.5 | +31.5 | 28 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 37.3 | 17.9 | +19.4 | 28 |
| Operational Transparency | 28.3 | 11.3 | +17 | 28 |
| Access Clarity | 38.9 | 22.3 | +16.6 | 28 |
| Discoverability | 69.7 | 60.4 | +9.3 | 28 |
| Contract Governance | 10.1 | 6.4 | +3.7 | 28 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 32% | 16% | +16 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 11% | 7% | +4 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 25% | 9% | +16 |
| Security | 96% | 88% | +8 |
| Arazzo workflows | 18% | 2% | +16 |
| Governance rules | 43% | 13% | +30 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Gitea 65.5
- 2 Postman 64.5
- 3 GitHub Copilot 63.7
- 4 Azure DevOps 58.3
- 5 Atlassian 54.7
- 6 Azure Repos 53.1
- 7 Bitbucket 50.1
- 8 Azure DevOps 50
- 9 Pluralsight 48.5
- 10 Greptile 42.8
- 1 Atlassian 41.9
- 2 GitHub Copilot 40.6
- 3 APIs.io Engineering Platform 37.8
- 4 Postman 36.5
- 5 Azure DevOps 34.4
- 6 Gitea 33.1
- 7 Hoplite 31.7
- 8 Lightdash 29.8
- 9 Azure DevOps 29.7
- 10 Macroscope 25.7
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.