niche · 0.2 market industry

Laboratory

Score 17.5 / 100 62 providers +3 via APIs 12 APIs Search apis.io →

Providers using this tag (62)

Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.

Developing 5 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 10 Limited public surface area
Emerging 15 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 31 Almost no public developer surface
Nawah ScientificCompanyScientific ResearchLife Sciences10.6Mettler-Toledo InternationalInstrumentsPrecisionFortune 10001 API10.4Antech DiagnosticsVeterinaryDiagnosticsReference Lab4 APIs10.3Binx HealthCompanyHealthHealthcareDiagnostics10.3OlarisCompanyHealthcareDiagnosticsPrecision Medicine1 API10.3BumameCompanyHealthcareHealth Screening10.2AbbelightCompanyBioimagingMicroscopyNanoscopy9.8WatersInstrumentsAnalytics1 API9.54D LifetecCompanyHealthcareDiagnosticsOncology9.3KariusCompanyDiagnosticsGenomicsInfectious Disease9.3AlereDiagnosticsPoint of CareHealthcare1 API8.7LeucineCompanyPharmaceuticalsManufacturingQuality Management8.6Carolina BioOncology InstituteCompanyHealthcareOncologyClinical Trials8.4Quest DiagnosticsDiagnosticsFortune 500Healthcare2 APIs8.4QuidelOrthoDiagnosticsHealthcareMedical DevicesIn Vitro Diagnostics7.8QvinCompanyHealthDiagnosticsWomen's Health7.2NuProbeCompanyLife SciencesGenomicsMolecular Diagnostics7.0ExamediCompanyHealthHealthcareHealth Tech1 API6.2AcchromtechCompanyChromatographyAnalytical InstrumentsScientific Instruments5.4Physical Property TestingCompanyTestingInstrumentationManufacturing5.2Sight DiagnosticsCompanyHealthcareMedical DevicesDiagnostics5.0AbsologyCompanyHealthcareMedical DevicesDiagnostics4.0PerkinElmerAnalytical InstrumentsDiagnosticsInformatics4.0bayomicsCompanyBiotechnologyProteomicsMass Spectrometry3.7TruvianCompanyDiagnosticsHealthBlood Testing3.7RevvityLife SciencesDiagnosticsHealthcare3.5AnalytiChemCompanyChemicalsReference Materials3.4Institut für ProduktqualitätCompanyTestingProduct Quality3.4AggreDyneCompanyMedical DevicesDiagnosticsIn Vitro Diagnostics3.3Epic SciencesCompanyHealthcareDiagnosticsOncology3.3Mercy BioAnalyticsCompanyHealthcareHealthDiagnostics3.3
Unrated 1 Not yet scored

APIs with this tag (12)

Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →

Developing 2 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 4 Limited public surface area
Emerging 3 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 3 Almost no public developer surface

Companies reaching this through an API (3)

These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Laboratory” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.

Arconic Roper Technologies University of Warsaw

Score breakdown

Frequency
52.1
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
1.6
spread across providers
Quality lift
20.3
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
0.0
strength of nearest seed neighbor

Related tags

Diagnostics 36 co-occurrences Scientific Instruments 7 co-occurrences LIMS 5 co-occurrences In Vitro Diagnostics 5 co-occurrences Point of Care 5 co-occurrences Samples 5 co-occurrences Biomarkers 5 co-occurrences Precision Medicine 9 co-occurrences

Where this tag comes from

Provider tag62
Api tag12
Openapi tag1
Openapi op tag19

Cohort brief

Auto-generated

The 59 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Laboratory, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.

Providers
59
of 62 in the catalog
Mean Kin Score
16.9
-6.0 vs catalog 22.9
Mean Agent Readiness
7.1
-4.8 vs catalog 11.9
Spread
3.3–49
median 11.5 · σ 13
How the 59 split by band
Exemplar 0Strong 0Developing 5Thin 10Emerging 15Minimal 29
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
FacetThis cohortCatalogDifferenceScored
Contract Governance 7 6.3 +0.7 59
Discoverability 57.3 58.1 -0.8 59
Access Clarity 20.7 26.5 -5.8 59
Developer Ergonomics 15.7 23.2 -7.5 59
Contract Quality 9.5 17.6 -8.1 59
Operational Transparency 4.1 13.7 -9.6 59

A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.

What this cohort publishes
ArtifactThis cohortCatalogDifference
MCP server (any) 7% 14% -7
MCP server (first-party) 0% 12% -12
Agent Skills 0% 0% 0
OAuth scopes 10% 11% -1
Security 98% 98% 0
Arazzo workflows 0% 2% -2
Governance rules 8% 14% -6

mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.

Top by Kin Score
  1. 1 Color 49
  2. 2 LetsGetChecked 48.1
  3. 3 Element Biosciences 47.3
  4. 4 Confident Cannabis 40.8
  5. 5 Metabolon 40.5
  6. 6 Quartzy 38.5
  7. 7 Liquid Instruments 37.2
  8. 8 Labstep 37
  9. 9 Scispot 34.8
  10. 10 Sigma-Aldrich 33.8
Top by Agent Readiness
  1. 1 Color 41.5
  2. 2 Metabolon 37.1
  3. 3 Slingshot Biosciences 36.2
  4. 4 LetsGetChecked 34.2
  5. 5 Agilent Technologies 30.6
  6. 6 Element Biosciences 27.7
  7. 7 Quartzy 24.5
  8. 8 Confident Cannabis 23.8
  9. 9 Scispot 22.3
  10. 10 Sigma-Aldrich 19.8
All 62 members of this roster resolve to a provider in the catalog; 59 carry a score (95%). The figures above describe the scored members only.
Coverage caveat. 54 of 59 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.

Work with this as data

Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.

MCP server

One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.

https://apis.io/mcp

Tools for tags

7 MCP tools reach this
  • find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.
  • get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.
  • cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.
  • cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.
  • apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.
  • resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.
  • find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
All 92 tools →

Call it yourself

curl for this page
This tag
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/laboratory"
All tags
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
As a scored cohort
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/laboratory"
The distribution (Pro)
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/laboratory/stats" \
  -H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"

Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.

Get an API key

Free tier, no form to fill in. Signing in shares your email address with us — we store it to create your key and to recognise you if you sign in with another provider. See our Privacy Policy and Terms.

A second provider on the same verified email joins the account you already have.